‘Why did you get up on over-service?’ Eye test plan spark debate


Independent The idea of presenting readers was divided Compulsory vision test for over 70 driversOlder motorists with multiple debate tests should apply to all ages rather than single.

Several shared examples of drivers of small and middle -aged small and middle -aged drivers dangerously, suggesting that all license holders will improve check security every three years.

Some pointed to foreign models in Greece and Philippines, where periodic medical and vision check is mandatory, and suggested that the UK could follow the suit.

Others called for targeted tests since 85, warning that losing license could be disastrous for rural and working pensioners.

While there was a consensus that no one should drive with faulty eye lights, many insisted that the focus should be on the enforcement of existing laws and deal with risky behavior by young drivers. "Why did you get up on over-service?" Asked one.

What did you say here:

All drivers should be tested, not only more than the 70s

I believe that all drivers must need to conduct compulsory eye tests regardless of their precedes, regardless of age. driving test And at three-year-old intervals.

I know people under the age of 60, whose vision is poor who still drives, then why more than just 70s? My optician needed to write strong glasses for a middle -aged customer, whose eyesight was abyssly, who then told her that she would run home and would pick up the glasses when she comes in. He had no right to stop him or report it.

And if someone is talking about mandatory repeat driving tests - it's not that it is a viable option, then looking at the ecological situation of our testing system - I would suggest that the first candidates should not exceed the 70s, but the arrogant young, 17–30, who are the major criminals behind our growing accidents. I am not just talking about speed; It seems that many bus rip Highway Code Once they pass and ignore small bits such as signaling, lane discipline or mirror use.

The toll of death on American roads is more than 40,000 per year. We had just over 1,600, in the US in the population around that fifth, and with a road network with very little, straight roads. The toll of their road-death is about five times which is the head of the population per population. We could do better, but we could completely spoil.

Evanstabetti

More than 85 compromise can work

With the increasing longevity of life, and a potential retirement age of 70 is not far away, it looks like a long time prematurely to apply compulsory eye tests.

AA, who has no ax to grind, confirm that young drivers and more than 90 still driving are most likely to be involved in road accidents where there are fatal and serious injuries.

On balance, I would say an eye test every two years that looks like a suitable compromise for more than 85 drivers. I am 72 years old, so you can argue that I have an ax to grind, but think of more than 70 people that they are still working to end, voluntary work, people living in rural communities do not have very little or any public transport infrastructure, and already treated farmers, who are already treated, are more than 70.

If a more 85 fails in an eye test, they should be given three months exemption to get glasses or contact lenses to fix their vision before a retist. Life will be transformed in most cases due to being banned.

There are no more than 70s vast majority decripit, knowing road rules and compared to the company's car drivers, white van men, and compared to young drivers who think they are Lewis Hamilton. So if you want to improve road safetyFirst think about the law to be properly applied.

Category

More than 50 has nothing to fear

As a middle-fifty woman, I would say that at the age of 50, everyone should be examined with an eye test that includes an area of vision test. I found out a brain wound at the beginning of the year. Happily, it is now decreasing; However, it was detected with the help of my local optician and a visit to an area of vision test. I was then sent to our main hospital for MRI, etc. for diagnosis. I have been assessed DVLA And am driving back.

So, more than 50 people have nothing to fear. It is about being honest and transparent. No one wants to be responsible for the death or injury of any other road user. We all need to be motivated to do wise work.

Gralcam1969

Self-proclaiming is flawed

At 70, you renew your license every three years, but it is free. Although they send you a medical form to fill you, you do not need a doctor to certify it as true. My father left for almost three years after his initial dementia and I felt that he had lost his concentration. Eventually, we had to get his GP to prove him to drive. But did we not do this, he could self-evil his medical condition every three years. Mam retired when his cataracts deteriorated greatly but after selling the car, he kept his license for ID purposes. I am in the early stages of cataract, and if things become too blurred to drive, I will stop. I do not drive already if arthritis is too bad. But I agree, not everyone is so safe and knows when to stop.

If forced to stay at any age, you qualify for a free local concessional journey pass, which also covers buses at the national level.

Ladycrumpsall

Testing from the age of 40 is important

Eyes are mirrors of your soul. All over 40 years of age should conduct compulsory tests every three years. An eye testing makes easy, now with technology optiasis, to install quickly if you have any problem - such as I had done last year - to see if cataract I had any bad. I knew that it was. Within two months I did my first thing, and within seven weeks I was on the way to being more than my other one. Eye tests can also explain if you have any degenerative problems and cancer. It is very important that you take care of your eyes.

Jhunk

Greece's strict testing governance

I live in Greece and have a Greek driving license. I had to go through a medical and an eye light to swap for a Greek license from the UK. Everyone in Greece who applies for a driving license also has to do so. Once someone reaches 65, these tests (therapy and eye lights) are performed every three years to the age of 80 years, when the new license is applied every two years with tests and an additional neurological test. At 85, a short driving test is also added. I am currently 72 years old and have a Greek license since going here many years ago. Personally, I think testing of medical and eye lights should be mandatory for all. Problems are not only in old age.

Greekdwid

A new industry for testing

At the age of 70, we already lose the rights we have earned for years. I was told that despite using them for years, a rented company could not rent a van to me.

Eye tests should be performed for all drivers from time to time; It will create a new industry, which will be similar to CSS tests for construction workers.

Now the employed voluntary system is rather silly and does nothing to prevent a driver from keeping a license if they do not want to lose it.

Martin

Consider restricted license

Given the accidents caused by older people with defective eye lights, it is very difficult to debate against the compulsory test. Yes, losing your license will have a serious impact on your freedom, but this does not mean that you should be allowed to drive defectively. Probably we should consider a restricted license that will only allow driving in daylight. (I am more than 70.)

David

Why choose more than 70s?

I decided not to drive for a year because I was waiting for eye operation. Yes, regardless of age, you should be able to see. Why choose in the seventies? Most people need their cataracts in their half -century and sixties. Young people have more accidents than older people, but no one should driving if they are not capable.

Worldtraveller

Over 70 annual testing

Here in the Philippines you should have an eye test in an approved optician before renewing your driving license every five years regardless of age. I think an annual test once over 70 years of age would be a good idea.

Company

Online screening can work

Most accidents are caused by young drivers, so it should be applied to all when retired regularly. These days, a proper screen can be done online, as well as you are checking that you are updated with highway code.

Lordlelson3

Some comments have been edited to this article for brevity and clarity.

want to share Your thoughtsJust register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the top stories of the day. Alternatively, click on 'login' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.

Make sure you follow us Community GuidelinesWhat can be found HereHow to comment for a complete guide Click here.

Independent The idea of presenting readers was divided Compulsory vision test for over 70 driversOlder motorists with multiple debate tests should apply to all ages rather than single.

Several shared examples of drivers of small and middle -aged small and middle -aged drivers dangerously, suggesting that all license holders will improve check security every three years.

Some pointed to foreign models in Greece and Philippines, where periodic medical and vision check is mandatory, and suggested that the UK could follow the suit.

Others called for targeted tests since 85, warning that losing license could be disastrous for rural and working pensioners.

While there was a consensus that no one should drive with faulty eye lights, many insisted that the focus should be on the enforcement of existing laws and deal with risky behavior by young drivers. “Why did you get up on over-service?” Asked one.

What did you say here:

All drivers should be tested, not only more than the 70s

I believe that all drivers must need to conduct compulsory eye tests regardless of their precedes, regardless of age. driving test And at three-year-old intervals.

I know people under the age of 60, whose vision is poor who still drives, then why more than just 70s? My optician needed to write strong glasses for a middle -aged customer, whose eyesight was abyssly, who then told her that she would run home and would pick up the glasses when she comes in. He had no right to stop him or report it.

And if someone is talking about mandatory repeat driving tests – it’s not that it is a viable option, then looking at the ecological situation of our testing system – I would suggest that the first candidates should not exceed the 70s, but the arrogant young, 17–30, who are the major criminals behind our growing accidents. I am not just talking about speed; It seems that many bus rip Highway Code Once they pass and ignore small bits such as signaling, lane discipline or mirror use.

The toll of death on American roads is more than 40,000 per year. We had just over 1,600, in the US in the population around that fifth, and with a road network with very little, straight roads. The toll of their road-death is about five times which is the head of the population per population. We could do better, but we could completely spoil.

Evanstabetti

More than 85 compromise can work

With the increasing longevity of life, and a potential retirement age of 70 is not far away, it looks like a long time prematurely to apply compulsory eye tests.

AA, who has no ax to grind, confirm that young drivers and more than 90 still driving are most likely to be involved in road accidents where there are fatal and serious injuries.

On balance, I would say an eye test every two years that looks like a suitable compromise for more than 85 drivers. I am 72 years old, so you can argue that I have an ax to grind, but think of more than 70 people that they are still working to end, voluntary work, people living in rural communities do not have very little or any public transport infrastructure, and already treated farmers, who are already treated, are more than 70.

If a more 85 fails in an eye test, they should be given three months exemption to get glasses or contact lenses to fix their vision before a retist. Life will be transformed in most cases due to being banned.

There are no more than 70s vast majority decripit, knowing road rules and compared to the company’s car drivers, white van men, and compared to young drivers who think they are Lewis Hamilton. So if you want to improve road safetyFirst think about the law to be properly applied.

Category

More than 50 has nothing to fear

As a middle-fifty woman, I would say that at the age of 50, everyone should be examined with an eye test that includes an area of vision test. I found out a brain wound at the beginning of the year. Happily, it is now decreasing; However, it was detected with the help of my local optician and a visit to an area of vision test. I was then sent to our main hospital for MRI, etc. for diagnosis. I have been assessed DVLA And am driving back.

So, more than 50 people have nothing to fear. It is about being honest and transparent. No one wants to be responsible for the death or injury of any other road user. We all need to be motivated to do wise work.

Gralcam1969

Self-proclaiming is flawed

At 70, you renew your license every three years, but it is free. Although they send you a medical form to fill you, you do not need a doctor to certify it as true. My father left for almost three years after his initial dementia and I felt that he had lost his concentration. Eventually, we had to get his GP to prove him to drive. But did we not do this, he could self-evil his medical condition every three years. Mam retired when his cataracts deteriorated greatly but after selling the car, he kept his license for ID purposes. I am in the early stages of cataract, and if things become too blurred to drive, I will stop. I do not drive already if arthritis is too bad. But I agree, not everyone is so safe and knows when to stop.

If forced to stay at any age, you qualify for a free local concessional journey pass, which also covers buses at the national level.

Ladycrumpsall

Testing from the age of 40 is important

Eyes are mirrors of your soul. All over 40 years of age should conduct compulsory tests every three years. An eye testing makes easy, now with technology optiasis, to install quickly if you have any problem – such as I had done last year – to see if cataract I had any bad. I knew that it was. Within two months I did my first thing, and within seven weeks I was on the way to being more than my other one. Eye tests can also explain if you have any degenerative problems and cancer. It is very important that you take care of your eyes.

Jhunk

Greece’s strict testing governance

I live in Greece and have a Greek driving license. I had to go through a medical and an eye light to swap for a Greek license from the UK. Everyone in Greece who applies for a driving license also has to do so. Once someone reaches 65, these tests (therapy and eye lights) are performed every three years to the age of 80 years, when the new license is applied every two years with tests and an additional neurological test. At 85, a short driving test is also added. I am currently 72 years old and have a Greek license since going here many years ago. Personally, I think testing of medical and eye lights should be mandatory for all. Problems are not only in old age.

Greekdwid

A new industry for testing

At the age of 70, we already lose the rights we have earned for years. I was told that despite using them for years, a rented company could not rent a van to me.

Eye tests should be performed for all drivers from time to time; It will create a new industry, which will be similar to CSS tests for construction workers.

Now the employed voluntary system is rather silly and does nothing to prevent a driver from keeping a license if they do not want to lose it.

Martin

Consider restricted license

Given the accidents caused by older people with defective eye lights, it is very difficult to debate against the compulsory test. Yes, losing your license will have a serious impact on your freedom, but this does not mean that you should be allowed to drive defectively. Probably we should consider a restricted license that will only allow driving in daylight. (I am more than 70.)

David

Why choose more than 70s?

I decided not to drive for a year because I was waiting for eye operation. Yes, regardless of age, you should be able to see. Why choose in the seventies? Most people need their cataracts in their half -century and sixties. Young people have more accidents than older people, but no one should driving if they are not capable.

Worldtraveller

Over 70 annual testing

Here in the Philippines you should have an eye test in an approved optician before renewing your driving license every five years regardless of age. I think an annual test once over 70 years of age would be a good idea.

Company

Online screening can work

Most accidents are caused by young drivers, so it should be applied to all when retired regularly. These days, a proper screen can be done online, as well as you are checking that you are updated with highway code.

Lordlelson3

Some comments have been edited to this article for brevity and clarity.

want to share Your thoughtsJust register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the top stories of the day. Alternatively, click on ‘login’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.

Make sure you follow us Community GuidelinesWhat can be found HereHow to comment for a complete guide Click here.

Web Desk: Web Desk is a dedicated team of authors and editors working for the website thelocalreport.in. This team is responsible for the daily editing and writing of articles, ensuring a steady flow of content that engages readers and keeps them informed. Their efforts contribute to the website's mission of delivering timely news and insightful commentary on various topics.
Recent Posts