Britain Felt like a safe place to trans in nineties, now, compared to, now, UK’s first transgender judge Said what she sees while raising the alarm Trans people.
The lawyers gave their first interview since working on it The process of taking the government to European Human Rights to European Court started from side Above April Bombing Supreme Court verdict On biological sex, Dr. Victoria McCloud It is a matter of concern that the ruling youth can affect the trans people who are considering coming out.
“When I came out, things were bizarrely better. It was of the nineties – we had no rights, but the atmosphere of fear was less”, Dr. McCloud states Independent.
Retired judge Herald as a symbol of diversity of modern judiciary, Said that she no longer sees Britain as a “safe place”.
“Since the decision was taken in Scotland, we have seen the announcement of the intentions of the massacre by the Institute in relation to the United Kingdom, to warn people what is going on. We have seen concerns from the United Nations and Europe’s council”, she says.
In June, the institute for massacre prevention and human security condemned the “recent judicial and government development” in the UK, stating that “attempts to harm transgender and snatched people from secrecy and distinguished them as’ others.”
“But the institute believes that these tricks are part of a comprehensive process of eradication. It is not only a government action, but also the story of the media, which ignored its voices, enmity and argue about the humanity of the Trans and the intersections,” the body said.
Dr. McCloud, who now lives in Ireland after leaving Britain in 2024, says she is “very cautious” when she returns to London – something that she is currently doing because she begins the process of challenging the decision.
“I am very cautious. When I come, I don’t see it as a safe place to go. Lovely CIS friend is great to help me stay out of risky situations, where I can be encountered or potentially attack, because, of course, of course, my face is quite well known.
“I am especially risk of creating a goal by some other extremes of the penis significant conceptual movement. And this is a concern. But I think it is important that I go ahead, and I will have to come back to media interviews and so on.”, He said.
McCloud has established Trans Exile Network (ten) to help other trans people who want to leave the country.
She says, “This includes families who are leaving the UK for their children. And it is a really big network, because there is a lot of concern about the future of children and the messages that they are getting”, she says.
Dr. The lawyers working on behalf of McCloud, 55, who stood last year, filed an appeal in the ECHR last week, in which their rights were violated under Article six of the European Conference on human rights – the right to fair and fair hearing by an independent tribunal.
The judge claims that the Supreme Court refused to allow him to intervene as to how the matter would affect himself and other trans people, he said that he did not give any reason for it.
“Decisions about us, that fundamentally change our rights, should not be done without us.
“The case is fundamentally related to fairness. Article is known as six, and it was a situation where the trans people were heard or represented anywhere in the whole case.”
Gender important campaigners were abolished after the verdict in April, placed as a win that would protect the rights of biological women.
But talking about the impact of the ruling, Dr. McCloud said she was worried about how it affects gay women, or other CIS women who do not correspond to female standards due to new emphasis on subjective appearance.
“I have a lot of stories about those who are not being abused to be trans. It is really common, and in fact, not only gay women, not only anyone who is probably a long woman or whatever it is.
“It is pioneer, I think, for more misuse of non-trans it, it is compared to transfing people, because most trans people are really quite invisible-we go in large lengths to be invisible, while people who are non-transactions do not need to do so.
.jpeg)
Dr. McCloud, who retired in 2024, is good for the jokes “Be a customer for a change” – instead, allows your Trans LED to lead the legal team.
The first case of history brought by such a team, Dr. McCloud is being represented by Oscar Davis, who is openly UK’s first non-binary barrister and Olivia Campbell-Cawendish, Founder and Executive Director of Trans Legal Clinic and the first Black Trans lawyer in the UK.
His team hopes that the case will take between 12 and 18 months – but if it is not considered by Echr in terms of priority, it may take up to seven years.
The Supreme Court’s decision has been praised as a win for women by gender significant groups, arguing that it will help protect single sex places.
Asked what she would say for CIS women with fear of Trans people entering single sex space, Dr. McCloud stated that the Trans people were able to reach single sex space for decades with ruling incidents, with no reported events.
“I understand the fact that in principle, you can get a person who says, ‘I am a woman’, and takes in and attack someone, but they can walk in any way. They are not transcerts. They are not translating people, and it is important to separate the two”, she says.
“In my case, for example, to get a gender recognition certificate, I have a medical diagnosis. I have medical experts reports. A court had to consider my case and evidence – so it is very tightly regulated.”
Dr. McCloud also suggests that, statistically, trans people are “more likely to attack non-transport in another way by people”.
“There are very few of us. You really do not have much likely to participate in people with a gender recognition certificate – only 8,500 of us in the 66 million country.