Kir StamorCabinet Reshuffle Has left Independent The readers overwhelmed their cabinet with just a new face.
Some saw this step as a practice instead of publishing the move ImprovementArguing that “the same face, different position” approach As described by our political editor David Madox To leave the risk Prime Minister With a weak, less experienced team.
Angela RenerThe readers have held dominant discussions with strong union relations with emphasis on its value as a working-class voice. His departure, some suggested, leaves Sir Kir more unsafe for rebellion from the left side of the labor and strips the cabinet of very important authenticity.
David Lemy And Yweet cooperNew roles also attracted the investigation. While some welcomed Cooper’s appointment as Foreign Secretary, others reduced the loss of Lemy’s international relations and questioned whether his new justice role was a demotion.
The guards of the stormer argued that the reshuffle is normal – and praised Rener for resigning quickly without a play.
Nevertheless, the overall vowel was one of the skepticism, with warnings that the labor did not tolerate the alleged flow as Nigel Faraj and improved the pace of improvement in elections.
What did you say here:
No reliable action on immigration
His government’s approach to the reshuffle and immigration of the kerr stormer thus confirms a deep disturbing reality: this labor administration is not taking any reliable action on the issue of intensive public concern.
The Prime Minister was selected on the promise of “stopping boats”, yet we have not seen any importance to achieve it. It sends the message, it is completely paralysis. By failing to control illegal migration and make a strong and visible plan to ensure systematic exile, the starrer is not only failing to distribute on a major vow; He is actively handing over political initiative to Nigel Faraj and Reform Party in a silver plate.
The government’s current course, vaccination between vague promises and inactivity, does not solve anything. It ignores the problem, insults the wisdom of voters, and only claims a lot of populistism to oppose a lot of populism.
Thomas
Do you say the stammer reshuffle – Do you think it is a new beginning or just a cosmetic change? Share your thoughts in Information Below
Trouble at the top, but time remains
Stories about the stammer reshuffle and rener are troublesome at the top WorkersWhich will not solve the renovation of corbin unacceptable and unimaginable distance from the revival of the alternative or lying ‘no policies’.
Nobody thought that May, Johnson, Trus and Sunak would be easy by Cameron recovering from 14 years and the star made mistakes. But there are still more than three years to go to labor to deal with issues and provide viable solutions for some of the most infallible problems in living political memory.
Heyenman
It is best to get a change with
Ed Devi is very well to be holy about this, but it is not that it was done by choice. If a senior member of the government keeps the goods and there is no option but to resign it. This could be more wider than expected, but there were rumors that there was any reason any one of the reasons in which something is to be said with it.
The ministerial reshuffle is nothing uncommon, nor are ministers forced to break the rules. I am sorry to see Rainer going, but I think she was contrary to ministers in the previous government, she left to immediately and use the PM as an opportunity to refresh and change his team.
Tanaquil2
Missing the strongest talent
Here can be unpopular, but Rener has never liked me as deputy PM. Sadly, I think the reshuffle recalls the strongest talent available. Yvette Cooper has all the characteristics for the job. It also recognizes Sir Keir. What is that old saying in politics? The person with whom you are afraid of the most competition, give him the role of Foreign Secretary, as they are kept out of the country.
AJH
Not a big reshuffle
Change of just three people is not a major reshuffle in any way!
Just look at the history of toris that have replaced every person in the cabinet with more sycophants or old Atonians over the last 15 years – or you can return to the last 46 years.
Campaign 4UKMS1983
Laughable
It seems to me that when Lemy was appointed Deputy Prime Minister, he has also been demoted by ‘reshuffle’ to the post of Justice Secretary. Maybe he is seen as a sign of less confidence in his foreign affairs capabilities?
This is something that is far away from me about the cabinet reshuffle. First of all, it is usually only the same people are being transported from a situation to a different position, such as their only qualifications that they are ‘loyal’ to the Prime Minister, and therefore worthy of a cabinet post – often despite being clearly insufficient in their previous positions.
But secondly, Lemi has created a synergy with other foreign governments and officials in the last 14 months-has he not become a ‘Vance-Visperer’? Now Cooper has to start with scratches on the same process, as these other foreign ministers have to know now and to meet his abilities and requirements.
Davani
Lamy in wrong role
I like David Lammy despite myself. I think he is sympathetic and civilized. But he says for such foolish things and such foolish, external thoughts. I think the Justice gig is beyond its abilities, as it requires a good bit of distance, decision and ability to reflect. Perhaps Northern Ireland or even Scotland would have a better job for him.
Brussels
Labor round hole and square pegs
Except for Yvette Cooper’s move, I do not expect this reshuffle to achieve much. I think all holes that are present with labor are round, but they have all the pegs. This is a fundamental problem that is near labor. The solution to the problems of this country which this country needs the right to the center approach, and the labor is very high on the left.
There is potentially a very serious difficulty for Sir Kire. There was a Labor MP who is sympathetic to Jeremy Corbin, who is chosen as a deputy leader, the Prime Minister will be tied. He has already weakened; The party’s cooperative deputy leader will reduce their rights less.
Then there is a budget in November. The taxes are likely to go over, the expenses are already spilling, and the Chancellor has been weakened, both from both their actions and the transfer of Darren Jones. A winter of severe dissatisfaction is in closure. It is highly likely that the Chancellor will not survive in the office.
This is a contradictory situation. This PM has a historically vast majority, yet he is very low in his authority. Their problem is complicated by their total lack of charisma, a evolution for U-turn and lack of experience and talent in their cabinet.
Krispad
Purify
“Civil War” was started by Morgan McSvi in a dishonest attempt to purify the left from the party. He will be happy to see Rener going, and the reshuffle is described as his work. The by -election is expected to prove the opportunity to rebuild the main principles and values of the labor.
Steveb21
Destroy labor
We have seen the Conservative Party, after dominating British politics for decades, destroyed ourselves in the last few years, now we are seeing that the labor party is doing the same.
A deep unpopular Prime Minister tries to prevent rot by bringing more and more ministers who combine with his unpopular views and policies-and it is only when the party is only in power because the collapse of the two-Pakistan system is due to the attractive effects of our first-pound-post electoral system when the collapse of two-sided systems.
In the 2024 general election, the level of support for labor should have ensured that we have an alliance, but instead gave a large labor majority. But now this support is also disappearing rapidly.
arboreal1
Stamor is more vulnerable without rener
Rainer’s loyalty and support for the stormer was one of the few reasons that the left backbenchers did not rebel as much as he would have liked. He is now much more unsafe at a complete host of issues that require their support.
Homosepines
Rener gave many boxes
No one is going to end the Starmer Rayner. She tickled several boxes, which no one else can do: working class, growing in a council house, getting pregnant at the age of 16, leaving school without grade and only became an MP through the Sangh. She can belong to those who have “broken CV” and “being put on scrap heap”. You must have feism and a ax of a fight to get yourself out of it.
Starmer on the other hand has a background of a working class, but he went to UNI and then worked as a barrister and was the head of CPS-more professional career and Cv together. He is a well -known MP from the region in London. So their background is like a little chalk and cheese.
The real question is: Who can tick many boxes and this level has real life experience? And there is simply tumbleweed. This is why it is nonsense to claim that he wanted to get rid of him anyway.
Lafti &praude
Lines will only make things worse
A line among Rener supporters and Starmers supporters is the last thing of the country at this time and it will make the public more different for the loss of labor loss and improvement.
Undoubtedly, Rener will be brought back to the government anyway a very long time (labor would have learned from Tories in this regard). Personally, I never thought that the Rener was a serious rival for the starrer (Streeting is a more serious contender) and there is no evidence that whatever was, he was trying to get rid of it, in Mciavelian fashion.
If the labor party tells about the issue, it will make some of their serious conditions worse. The public is not just interested – they want the problems of the country to be decided.
Mussil
Some comments have been edited to this article for brevity and clarity.
want to share Your thoughtsJust register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the top stories of the day. Alternatively, click on ‘login’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.
Make sure you follow us Community GuidelinesWhat can be found HereHow to comment for a complete guide Click here.