IT was a dissatisfied backbane that carried forward the mood in labor Tomorrow’s expenses review Announcement by Rahel reeves,
“You don’t become Labor MP To cut, ”the MP said, in view of the possibility Need at least £ 5bn In government departments – to meet plans to spend the Chancellor’s spending – including housing, local government and policing.
The billions of pounds of the required savings estimated by the House of Commons Library, a calculated calculation by the Chancellor a calculation before spending one year for another £ 1.25bn. Winter fuel payment restoration To 9 million pensioners.
When? Chancellor reaches her feet Following the Prime Minister’s questions on Wednesday, he would not have any doubt that the labor will be happy by the Labor MPs.
But the reality is that the applause will be very high to perform rather than being warm.
The truth is that senior members of the government – and the comprehensive party – are now openly in war with Sir Kir starrer and Ms. Reeves on economic policy.
Somehow in his eyes, Ms. Reeves will effectively confirm “Tapasya 2.0” in reviewing her expenses, but would not have promoted to promote what she had promised.
Labor will be the worst in all the world.
Already, the bitterness and bad spirit that is felt by negotiating on available budgets is threatening to deepen for a long time after Ms. Reeves made her statement.
especially, Home Secretary Yett Cooper The Starmer-Reveves has emerged as an amazing rival for the project and was said to have resigned on the clock after the treasury applied an agreement to his department.
But a Deputy Principal Minister is out of an out of Angela Rener, whose colleagues are potentially in exercises to trigger a leadership challenge against Sir Keer at some point in the future.
After weeks of bitter conversation, Ms. Rener settled reluctantly on Sunday evening, according to an MP, a danger is that he too will be on an agreement on his housing ministry, communities and local government (MHCLG).
Both Ms. Rener and Ms. Cooper will spend further months to defend the compulsory deduction by a Chancellor, which she herself opposed.
The problem for Ms. Reeves and Sir Keer is that they are not only failing to give significant economic growth, but also the number of jobs – almost as fast.
In the election of Still, English Council, Scottish and Welsh, several labor MPs are seen as a marker in May next year whether to look for a change on top.
An MP said that “poisoning in the party has definitely fallen” since the local elections. It was largely placed below for a U-turn on winter fuel.
But it seems that there is a lot of pushing for more changes in the direction on two-child profit cap and disability profit payment.
Other people will look for a very difficult stance on Israel.
Meanwhile, spending reviews will not eliminate logic on economic policy, but rather, fuel it.
Now that Ms. Rainer’s Memo to MS Rews – Call for eight money taxes on super rich and large corporations – out in the open, the calls will only grow loudly to implement them contrary to making the cut cut cut.
As Excluded by IndependentTrade union is now among full supportersPromotion of such a step for money taxes through TUC.
As the biggest financial supporters of labor, they lift a lot of weight and will strongly affect the debate.
All this adds to the speculation that an upcoming reshuffle can end in the Treasury’s time of Ms. Reeves. If Ms. Reeves is getting strange about being committed to high future defense spending, it can be done in a hurry – some are much more committed to the Prime Minister.
If Sir Keer decided that his existence depends on changing direction in a new Chancellor and economic policy, he would go away. The only serious question will be who takes his place.
