Culture secretary Lisa Nandi The challenge of addressing AI and copyright was “not kicked in long grass” as he accepted Government Shortcomings in trying to make laws.
Ms. Nandi said that Minesters have failed to ensure that the debate did not become a “binary” option amidst supporting the AI region or creative industries.
data (Use and access) Act was passed earlier this year, which focused on changes in data protection laws in a dialect to promote innovation and economic development.
But the law was entangled in a dispute amid concerns that the work of creative would not be preserved as the AI region grows.
The bill was modified by peers, who was in a dialect to prevent copyright work being used to train the AI model without permission or remuneration.
The government is now consulting with representatives of both regions in a bid to agree in a solution that supports AI innovation protecting creative industries.
On appearing before the Commons Culture, Media and Sports Committee, Ms. Nandi was challenged whether the government would ensure that the creative was given remuneration when her work was used by AI.
He said: “There was some concern between some MPs, especially in the House of Lords, and I met with all those who expressed concern that the government was somehow trying to kick it in long grass.
“I commit a commitment to this committee Parliament That we will not do this at all, and that in any sense, we will not allow it to delay unnecessarily. ,
Referring to conversation with the new Science Secretary Liz KendalHe said: “I make this commitment today, that we are not going to kill it in long grass.
“We are going to catch this issue and looking for a solution, and that almost echoes the words that the state secretary used to me in the cabinet yesterday.”
The Culture Secretary was asked whether the broad minister Parivartan in recent reshuffle has represented a recognition by the government that “he has found it in a spectacular way”.
He said: “I think this is a question for the Prime Minister. It is not a question for me, and you may know some of you, through reshuffle in their time, people are not always taken into the Prime Minister’s belief as to what decisions are made.”
Earlier, Ms. Nandi said that the issue was “to resolve it really difficult” and that “people feel very strongly about it, for all the right reasons”.
He said: “I don’t think as a government we collectively enough – and I take full responsibility for it – and I think we think we have allowed the debate to become very binary: you are either for creative industries or you are for AI.
“We deliberately tried to separate this law that we were going through a special issue around AI and copyright in this area. I don’t think it has done this work.”
Referring to the polarized nature of the debate in Parliament, Ms. Nandi said: “I say to you very person, I have not publicly said this before, but one of my big frustrations with it is that it was a DSIT (department for science, innovation and technology), which was not being present in the debate in Parliament, which is as my equivalent and a friend.
“It became a debate that was very high around AI, where creative industries needed to see that their secretary was also very visible and the parliamentary process and rules did not allow it.”
The data (use and access) Act became the Act was sponsored by the Department of Law Science, Innovation and Technology.
Mr. Kyle, who was the then Science Secretary at that time, was appointed as the Secretary of Business in the reshuffle.