Are you thinking something illegal? Get ready to go to jail for the “minority report” style. Have you said something about the government that was derogatory? For you non-call-speakers departed for Gulag. Welcome to the atrocities of the police state, we all knew that George Orwell Style, yet. Thought the police is coming, and you can be mentally disqualified to walk on the streets at any moment. Are you ready?
Reporaged with permission from Article by SD Wells Naturalnews.com
In a chilling reflection of totalitarian rule in the past, the US government is rapidly using Mental health law To take individuals into custody without any procedure, increase the alarm about a new form of political suppression. An executive order issued by former President Trump, which aims to address the homeless through extended involuntary civil commitments, has severely criticized a modern police for doing ground work for the state. Prepared as a kind reaction to mental illness and public safety, the policy allows for forced institutionalization of individuals based on unclear assessment of mental volatility rather than solid criminal behavior.
- Mental health under the pretext of political control: The government is rapidly using mental health justification, such as civil commitment law, to detain individuals – especially homeless and without appropriate procedure, instead of legal standards with subjective psychiatry evaluation.
- Dissatisfy: Historical and recent examples show how political opposition in the form of mental illness is being rebuilt. The whistleblower, giants and critics of government policies have been forcibly detained or mentally labeled, which resonates the Soviet-Strategy of Silenting Silenting.
- Monitoring and future policing infrastructure: A vast monitoring network-including AI-conducted behavior monitoring, biometric tracking, and wearable data-is being expanded under the guise of public health, which enables premeptive custody based on alleged risks rather than real offenses.
- An idea of crime rule: With the laws of the red flag, the state is forming the basis for a system where the government’s beliefs, apprehenses, or criticisms can be criminalized as a threat to public safety, targeting the entire categories of vague extremist labels, and executive orders, targeting the entire categories of people.
The New Galg: Mental Health Detains and Decision Criminalization
Critics have warned that this approach paves the way for the government to labeled as disgruntled, workers, or even dangers, which makes them right to remove their removal from society. This echoes the Soviet-era strategy where psychiatric diagnosis was used to silence political opposition. Due to no new funding for housing or treatment, this step appears to be more punitive than rehabilitation – reducing mental illness to expand state control. The increasing use of government’s behavioral data from wearballs, AI monitoring, and red flag laws to monitor the “pre-pronounced” behavior enhances these concerns.
The results are already visible. Whistleblower and critics such as NSA Ras Tice, NYPD officer Adrian School Craft, and Marine Veteran Brandon Rub have all been forcibly detained under suspected psychiatric shows. Government programs such as operation vigilance eagle and DHS danger assessment now blur the lines between political activism and extremism, putting a broad trap on giants, gun owners and constitutionalists.
This approach replaces legal standards with subjective medical decisions, reduces the estimated process, and innocence estimates such as fundamental constitutional security. Once dissatisfaction is equal to mental illness, the opposition is not punished, but not for beliefs, but for beliefs. Historical examples-From Soviet Gulag to the administrative exile of the Cold War-era, such that psychiatry can serve the suppression of the suppression totalitarian loops.
The infrastructure for such suppression is growing: monitoring system, AI-operated behavior analysis, mental health data access and preventive preventive law. While it is often justified in the name of security, these tools risk the US to convert the US into a society where thought crimes are punished with institutionalization. The danger is not imaginary – it is revealed in real time, which expands the state power under the guise of compassion and security.
This “mental health gulag” begins with the homeless, but may soon include any critic of the government’s policy. As history has shown, once repression machinery is set in motion, it rarely stops with its original goals. The fight against terrorism, drugs and epidemics began with all valid concerns, but developed in the mechanism of monitoring and control.
Now, a new war loop: The War on Disecent. If uncontrolled, such policies can criminalize resistance and rude in an era where freedom of thought itself becomes an obligation. The cost of inactivity may be an erosion of freedom under silent weight of institutional power.
Tune your apocalypne dial Preparation. For updates on real news about the censorship industrial complex to avoid the industrial complex and to speak or publish the truth.
The sources of this article include: