AS Sir Kir stood with Emmanuel Macron to unveil the stormer In a “groundbreaking” one, a migration deal, Independent The readers were in a hurry to react – and the reactions ranged from cautious hope to lump sum dismissal.
Some people saw the deal as a long -term diplomacy after a long -increased diplomatic and political posture.
Many people welcomed to move away from the expensive Rwanda scheme of the conservatives, calling this new approach more practical and inherent in cooperation. A reader praised the stamor to behave like a “adult” on the world stage and finally to achieve a deal that removed the previous Prime Ministers.
But doubt is largely. Some readers questioned whether the plan, which sent back only 50 migrants in a week, could match the scale of the challenge at any time.
Many others argued Number Just did not add, with still crossing hundreds every week, wondering whether it can become a version of Rwanda: expensive, ineffective and ultimately more symbolic than symbolic.
Naturally, many blamed Brexit for disintegrating systems that once helped manage asylum claims. But others remained unrelated to close ties with the European Union.
There were calls for difficult preventives including offshore processing and biometric trekking, but also a reminder from some, which will change much rarely, without dealing with the root causes or expanding legal routes.
What did you say here:
Positive, optimistic and straightforward talk
Macron must have made a lot of friends in the UK on this visit. He has been positive, optimistic and straightforward talk, no one draws punches. We are now close to France and Europe, because we have been for many years, and most British people are in its favor.
Small boat crossing? Some, finally, is being done. The Rwanda Yojana brought to you from the choice of Sula Breverman, was a waste of time and a waste of money. Cooperation between neighbors is very intelligent. Let’s see what it works, because desire.
Regcostalo
Do you think the Starmer -Macron migration deal will help reduce small boat crossings? Share your thoughts in Information,
A deal, but as we know it
Well, this is a deal I think, but as they say, as we don’t know it.
More important things were discussed, and President Macron told them at the press conference.
But, of course, the elephant in the room was always braxit. Macron was very humble and direct to say very clearly, but his idea was clear. The entire project was and there is a disaster.
Had not been braxted, the issue of small boats would not have increased in the British political agenda as we were now members of the European Union’s plans not being implemented. It’s fun how the numbers were mushrooms after 2018, Eh?
Did Brexit not teach the politicians of this country? Britain is not just so important. For some reason, they still walk on an egg peel because they are still afraid of those who provoked this disaster on us. The public has now heated them. Time was caught by our politicians. Brexit should be reversed.
49niner
Still embarrassed by Brexit
France should be bloody, as a lot of braxits seem desperate to leave for Britain. Even today, the UK Public has ended to be a temple to vote for the UK Public to withdraw from the European Union project.
He raised a good point about the bridge factor, but there is a possibility of a starrer who addressed this.
Noverngit1
A drop in the Ocean
Many people are quite right that a few hundred per week – the weather permission – so 50 per week is a decline in the sea. This is very true.
However, 80 to 100 percent of applicants from Afghanistan, Turkey, Iran, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, South Sudan, and who are considered Statements (to mention some major countries) are accepted as real refugees. This means that the total number of refugees in Britain will not be different until the UK changes its policy.
People also forget that no matter how bad in the UK consider the conditions for so many bad refugees and people who took shelter for many of these people, it is like heaven on earth from where they came.
No matter what it is, which come with Strams and Macron, it is unlikely to have much effect. There will be a need to make a concrete effort by countries that are desperate to reduce the number of migrants that they are being forced to deal with, and the countries cause non-existence of those to get out.
Maybe those countries – Europe raise the brunt of this – there is a need to spend more energy and money to deal with the root cause rather than throwing money on the result. Cutting foreign aid will not help.
Economic migrants, or anyone who is not ready to reveal who they are, from where they come from, if necessary, if necessary, should return after being registered biometrically in a third country, so no return with a new name is possible. This would mean that European countries will have to cooperate, which will probably be the first challenge!
Inhuman
Brexit’s wrong way
Macron is right, we were sold a lie in 2016. But not only migrants – in a long list of other broken promises and expectations.
For not being, the choice of the farage is an excuse: obviously, it was a wrong type of Brexit!
Tonight on BBC News, Badenoch claimed that the latest deal was not good as Rwanda scheme. The Rwanda scheme promised that 200 migrants would be returned in one year. The stormer deal starts at 50 in a week. Well, there is not a large number, but 50 is 2,600 per year in a week.
Tommy2tops
A different level starmer
I think Macron is getting appropriately appropriate. He is at a different level, which is for the starrer.
You cannot expect that French will bend backwards to prevent migrants from leaving their shores.
Everyone has the right to claim asylum.
Britain, as usual, is trying to claim extraordinaryness.
Cyclone 8
Dingi crossing the corner at the crossing
Some more deals with Germany, Spain, Italy, etc., and we can bend the corner on the dingi crossing. What we take, they can work and there is no need to stay in the hotel.
Torses cannot complain. His Rwanda scheme, cost of hundreds of crores, to deal with six people per week.
Justonemoreting
safe passage
Wise deal, especially opening a safe passage on the French side.
Trees complain that it is only in 50 weeks, ignoring their Rwanda deal is allowed 300 in only one whole year! Improvement is nervous and hoping that it does not work – if this happens, why vote them?
This will definitely not happen because they are pre-installation party, with the rank filling with pre-tori MPs!
Hamarhead 72
Got over the last three PM
Despite the forecasted stream of negativity about the effect of this, it is still more deal than any of the three predecessors of a starmer.
The pilot scheme may be able to return several thousand people per year, which is more than the Rwanda scheme.
For all the tori outrage about its elimination, it will be removed only a few hundred people in only one year.
Tanaquil2
Possibility
In one, one has the ability to work in a policy. But only if every person who tries to cross the channel in boats and enter the UK comes back to France.
If this was to be done, they will stop trying very soon, as the cast-ayon will be due to certainty that they will be returned to France, which means that they are paying organized criminals for these boats.
This will also benefit France, as this bridge will remove the factor that is pulling them only in France to reach the UK.
Mark
Remove financial incentives
The only thing that makes these crossings less attractive is to remove financial incentives and/or processing applications in a third country.
Medicinal
An adult in the room
Is it not surprising what can be achieved by the adult PM who speaks the French President? Starting with Cameron via May, Johnson, truss, especially, and slightly melting with hearing, is hoping fifteen years of opponent – no, demands – cooperation. Now we have an adult PM, and the results.
Of course, there is space for improvement, but it is a beginning. Joining the European Union will not improve those things, as is now recognized.
In a range
Nothing has been achieved
Just what exactly has been achieved? Boats will still continue to come.
Re -add the European Union – why? The so -called economic powerhouse country, Germany and Frank, E are performing worse than themselves. Anything is just tampering.
Noverngit1
Some comments have been edited to this article for brevity and clarity.
Want to share your thoughts? Just register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the top stories of the day. Alternatively, click on ‘login’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.
Make sure you follow us Community GuidelinesWhat can be found HereHow to comment for a complete guide Click here.