Key Charlie Kirk eyewitness silenced at Turning Point, now shut down by gag order?

Web Desk,

Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source

In case you missed it, we recently brought you news of the unprecedented gag order issued in the Charlie Kirk/Tyler Robinson case, which prevents anyone associated with the case – including more than 3,000 witnesses who were on the Utah Valley University campus at the time of Charlie Kirk’s murder – from speaking openly and publicly about it.

More details on that here:

BREAKING: Judge in Tyler Robinson case issues GAG order banning nearly all coverage of the trial

And when I first saw there was a video my attention was immediately drawn to it.

I posted about it soon after September 10th because that’s when I knew it wasn’t right…something was very wrong.

In fact, I went back and tried to find my original article on this and I can’t find it, it seems to have been removed?

I know I posted about this shortly after September 10th but now I can’t find it. Maybe one of you can help me find it and post it in the comments, if you do?

The article was about this courageous eyewitness account where a student was describing exactly what he saw (and this contradicts what is now in the official report).

The child looks calm, cool, confident, collected and is giving his testimony very well.

And then what happens?

A group of Turning Point USA employees approach him, take his mic and forcefully turn it off.

See here:

Let’s hope it doesn’t get removed again!

Back up here if necessary:

I told you in that moment that this kid would be important and how TPUSA cut him off didn’t feel right at all.

Why would they do this?

Why would anyone do that?

Wouldn’t you like to hear from as many people as possible?

It felt very strange at that moment and today it feels even worse.

what about this one?

Will this also be silenced?

or this?

ALSO READ  Breaking: ABC News was busting for misleading editing in the new interview?

or this

Or how about this young lady?

Why are we not allowed to hear from these people?

Why are there no cameras in the courtroom?

Why is all this being silenced and blackholed?

Watch: Statement of eyewitness of Charlie Kirk murder case now silent!

Yesterday, we brought you news of an unprecedented gag order issued in the Charlie Kirk/Tyler Robinson case, which prevents anyone associated with the case – including more than 3,000 witnesses who were present on the Utah Valley University campus at the time of Charlie Kirk’s murder – from speaking openly and publicly about it.

More details on that here:

BREAKING: Judge in Tyler Robinson case issues GAG order banning nearly all coverage of the trial

I understand I don’t want to taint the jury pool, but hasn’t that ship already sailed?

In America, don’t we prefer open and honest judicial systems?

Isn’t sunlight the best disinfectant?

Isn’t more information and more testimony generally the answer, not less?

No censorship?

Doesn’t excessive censorship create fears that something suspicious is going on?

Look, I’m in no way favoring Tyler Robinson or saying he didn’t do it, I’m just asking why can’t we hear from eyewitnesses?

Like this young woman, who told her account soon after the September 10 incident.

Is this banned now?

See here:

Back up here if necessary:

Let them talk!

Let them share what they saw!

Here was our full original report on the gag order:

BREAKING: Judge in Tyler Robinson case issues GAG order banning nearly all coverage of the trial

The Charlie Kirk murder case is becoming more complicated by the day…

Judge Tony Graf, who is presiding over the trial of alleged murderer Tyler Robinson, has quietly issued a very sweeping restraining order affecting thousands of people.

ALSO READ  Plague cases spark outbreak concerns in western U.S.

The judge’s gag order prevents anyone associated with the case – including more than 3,000 witnesses who were on the Utah Valley University campus when Charlie Kirk was murdered – from speaking openly and publicly about it.

The gag order was issued during Tyler Robinson’s hearing in late September.

According to the judge his reasoning was this “Prevent problems associated with pre-trial publicity.”

fox 13 Details reported on:

Prosecutors also discussed the gag order that Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graf had entered in the case, which could create problems. It prevents anyone associated with the case from speaking to the news media.

“There are a number of witnesses that have not yet been identified that will be used in the state’s case. This happened at Utah Valley University in front of two or three thousand students, so we are in the process of identifying those witnesses, so those witnesses remain unidentified at this time,” Grunander said.

Judge Graf said the restriction order was designed to prevent problems associated with pre-trial publicity.

He said, “The court will decide that as soon as those witnesses become known to each party, that information will be given to comply with this order. Obviously, there are potentially many witnesses and it is not expected that you will do that in advance, but as they become known.”

In other words, the gag order effectively silences anyone who may have witnessed anything on that fateful day.

I am not making the excuse of ‘wanting to avoid pre-trial publicity’.

I feel like they’re trying to stop something from coming out…

Others on X agree that this looks very suspicious:

To add strangeness to all this, FBI Director Kash Patel recently said he would not be releasing any new footage or evidence in the case:

Very strange.

ALSO READ  The Miraculous Healing Power of DMSO: Nature’s Forgotten Cure for Cancer, Pain, and Regeneration

I’m not saying that Tyler Robinson is innocent by any means.

But, it’s clear that the official FBI narrative about the shooter doesn’t include a lot of details.

And yet, Patel says that’s all?

Case closed?

Then, it’s sealed with a massive gag order to prevent anyone out there from saying otherwise.

All of this begs the question: Why is everything so tightly locked?

Why are they so afraid of coming into the light?

Then, you have Candace Owens, swearing to violate the restraining order on behalf of all witnesses:

Only time will tell if he has the receipts to back up that dramatic statement…

Let’s hope that somehow, the truth will come out, whatever it may be.

Charlie deserves it.

What are your thoughts on all this?

United States