KThe year stormer has spent most of its first year in an attempt to prepare the public for pain in the office.
but as Our recent Independent Ask me anything came to know from Q&AThis government is now feeling heat – politically hurt, financially corrected, and rapidly exposing on its central promise: stability in exchange for tax growth.
Rahel reeves LaccopaAfter a labor rebellion, who forced a U-turn on welfare reform, expressed the bind.
“Slate” RiVs claimed that the cleaning has been erased last year, filled again – and Bill, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, may soon run up to £ 40BN in the new tax raise. Once the promised penance is not a clean brake with labor.
In this context, Starmer’s new 10-year NHS scheme A policy declaration as compared to a political lifeline looks less: equal to Labor in the early 1980s, which saves Margaret Thecher. The launch of the scheme was designed to answer the question. Reeves and Stamor are still not resolved – what is the reward For all this pain?
Meanwhile, dissatisfaction is turning into an open rebellion on the left side of the labor. Just Sultana is suspended to oppose the two-child profit cap, Leave the party To co-insert a new political movement with Jeremy Corbin. Corbin says “discussion is going on”, but the direction is clear. Labor’s internal stress – on welfare, war and public services – are no longer ideological. They are electoral.
More than below Q&A This suggests that the left -wing breakway movement and the Lump Autumn budget can mean for a government that is now struggling with the welfare reform crisis and increasing pressure on the leadership of Kir stormers.
Question: Are there two labor parties now: Starrer leadership circle vs.
Critical
A: There has always been tension between the party and the party in Parliament in the constituencies. Sometimes borders shift; So far, a lot of labor MPs formed an alliance with party members on the issue of disability profit. But the most successful period in the history of the party was when a small group around Tony Blair controlled the party and maintained a coalition of support between Labor MPs and members. It is always worth remembering that party members voted for David Miliband instead of their brother in 2010. Starmer has failed to build such a broad alliance at the party.
Question: If Rener becomes PM, will he try a separate economic approach – and will the markets tolerate it?
Paul kerny
A: I do not believe that Rener will try a different economic approach if you change fiscal rules. Rules are not arbitrary or foolish self-restrained restrictions designed to prevent a labor government from doing good things. They are necessary to maintain market confidence. Rener is a practical, and I think she understands it easily. Its advantage is that he may be able to improve logic for economic strategy compared to Kir Stmper or Rachel Reaves.
Question: Will Corbin’s new party attract labor culprits?
Jais
A: I think one of the reasons for Jeremy Corbin to be reluctant to start a new party is that he considers the British electoral system the best. He knows that he can win as a person with long name recognition in Isington North, but the so -called parties on the left side of labor are more or less for irrelevances. The last time a leftist party, unlike famous persons, won seats in the House of Commons, was the Communist Party in 1945, and both of them were lost in 1950.
Since then, George Gallow has won seats as a person, but does not have a workers party.
Question: Are Angela Rener emerging as the real leader of Labor?
Sofeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
A: He is a better easy understanding of politics and is a better communicator than the Prime Minister. Not only did she lead the second capitulation for Labor Rebels on the Disability Benefits Bill, given that it was necessary to avoid the risk of defeat, but she ensured that the world knew that she was insisting on it.
It has been suggested that it pushed the Kir Stmper to dig the Pip section of the bill when the government was going to win votes as a way to weaken the Prime Minister. I suspect that this is true: I think his argument was right that the vote was on a knife and the government could not take the risk of losing-it was better to postpone and fight the day.
Question: Should the star be reshuffled in his top team – and Kendall should go?
Babenb
A: In my view, the reshuffle never works as a way to fix government popularity, and often has the effect of transferring good ministers as they are gaining momentum. I think Kendal was asked to be impossible, but that he should prepare a plan in protest to return to the in-tradition assessment for disability benefits, to deal with an increase in mental unhealthy claims, and so on. But he should be replaced only when there is a person who can do a better job.
Question: Was welfare reform ever viable?
Loose
A: It was ruined from the beginning, and the chief whip, Alan Campbell told the Keer Stmper in March, when it was launched. It was forced to Liz Kendal by Rachel Reeves, who needed to find £ 5BN in a year by the end of Parliament to keep public finance on a permanent rung. Candal cannot offer changes such as switching back to in-tradition assessment rather than telephone/zoom interview, which should reduce the number of claims given, but which cannot be counted as a savings by the office for the responsibility of the budget because no one can be sure about them. Therefore, those zodiac signs can be cut, which can be claimed and ban on claiming them, which were unacceptable to the MPs who were sufficient to eradicate the majority of the government.
Question: Why will the labor no longer get rid of the starrer?
Dave Smith
A: Party members already want to get rid of them, a year later he gave the second largest parliamentary majority. In late May, a living/laborist poll found that 42 percent of the members want the leader’s change before the election; 40 percent did not; The rest did not know.
The most popular option among party members Andy Burnham is the mayor of Greater Manchester, but as he is not an MP, he is out of running. At present there is no constituency in the country that labor can be sure to win in the by -elections to bring it back to Parliament.
So members are arguing to handle Angela Rener. This is not an abusive idea: he is one of the few in the cabinet that has increased his reputation in the first year (see below). But he is not very popular with the public. Will he actually change the fate of labor dramatically? Perhaps we should wait and see how many houses have been built by 2028.
Question: Should Morgan McSwini go?
Ben brown
A: I roughly agree with the Prime Minister: McSin won the election for the Labor Ministers, so they should pipe and do what he says. In addition, any person is actually calling for the PM’s change for the PM’s advisor. I think it’s very early for him.
These questions and answers were part of one Ask ‘Me Einthi’ hosted by John Rentaul BST at 2 pm on Friday, July 4. Some questions and answers have been edited for this article. You can read the complete discussion in the comment section Original article,
For more insight into UK politics, see John’s weekly Commons confidential newspaper. Email, independent for exclusive Outward value Subscriber, takes you behind the curtain of the Westminster. If it seems something you are interested, Head here to learn more.
