The ballerina claimed she first met Epstein in 2004.

New Delhi:

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein took advantage of an aspiring dancer and exploited her mother’s vulnerability during her battle with brain cancer, a report claims.Victim Danielle Bensky files lawsuit against Epstein’s longtime personal attorney Darren Indyke and his accountant Richard Kahn

The civil lawsuit, which seeks a class action on behalf of Epstein’s victims, accuses Indyke and Kahn of “aiding, abetting and facilitating” Epstein’s widespread sex trafficking operation.according to complainThe two men played a key role in building a “sophisticated financial infrastructure” that enabled Epstein to sexually abuse numerous young women and girls for more than two decades.

Benski’s tragic experience account It details how Epstein allegedly used her mother’s brain tumor diagnosis as leverage to manipulate and control her. The ballerina claims she first met Epstein in 2004, when she paid him $300 for a massage at his New York mansion. Bensky alleges that she continued to provide similar massages, sometimes involving sexually explicit conduct, at his insistence, fearing the repercussions of Epstein’s wealth and influence.

The lawsuit alleges that after Epstein learned of Benski’s mother’s diagnosis, he used the situation to force the then-teen to recruit other girls for him. Epstein claimed to know the best surgeon in New York and offered to help Benski’s mother, but only if she complied with his demands. Epstein even threatened to stop providing treatment to Bensky’s mother if she didn’t meet his demands, the lawsuit says.

Over the next year, Epstein allegedly made various threats against Benski, forcing her to live a “cult-like life” controlled and manipulated by the convicted sex offender. The lawsuit involves Indyke and Kahn, claiming they were well aware of Epstein’s crimes and knowingly benefited from his illegal activities.

Indyk and Kahn, who are also executors of Epstein’s estate, have denied the accusations. Their lawyer, Daniel Weiner, called the accusations “baseless and legally meaningless” in a statement and claimed the pair had never been found guilty of any wrongdoing.