New-proven government files have suggested that returning from Iraq war was ‘politically impossible’ until dictator Saddam Hussein Surrender.
UK ambassador warns that president George W. Bush Hussain was bent on overthrowing as part of a “mission” to get rid of the world of “Evil-Daers”.
In January 2003 – US and UK Forces started their attack two months ago – Tony Blair For Camp David To request more time to work for diplomacy to urge the President.
However, files were released National archives But KeewWest London, showing that the UK Ambassador to the US, Sir Christopher Mayor warned that it became “politically impossible” to pull back from the war until Hussein surrendered.
British officials were still expecting that United nations security council Especially will agree with a new proposal authorizing the use of military force against Iraq.
Mr. Blair’s foreign policy advisor, Sir David Manning said that when he met the President, he should say that a new resolution was “politically essential for Britain, and almost certainly necessary legally necessary”.
However, American France and Russia were becoming increasingly impatient with the reluctance of Russia – which both had a veto on the council – to agree on a proposal until the United Nations Inspector Hussain was unable to find any evidence of Hussain. Weapons of collective destructionAlleged justification for war.
After the annual of Mr. Bush state of the Union Know the Congress, shortly before the visit of Mr. Blair, he warned that a peaceful solution options had effectively gone out.
He said, “It is impossible for Bush to return to this spring by going to the war in Iraq, Saddam’s surrender or disappearance from the scene.”
“If Bush already had a place for maneuver, it was closed by his State of the Union speech.
“In high-sustaining prose, in which Bush is drawn on these set-pieces opportunities, he said that destroying Saddam is a crusade against the evil committed by God’s chosen people.”
In a cable sent last month, Sir Christopher said that many impulses to submit Hussain were coming from a Christian, which he had seen as the “self-service” reservation of Europeans.
Sir Christopher wrote, “His view of the world is Manichian. He relieves his mission to evil. He believes that American values should have universal value.”
“He is collectively allergic to Europeans. Anyone who is sitting on a dinner table with a low-range sarder will find these emotions immediately recognizable.”
In this incident, the US and Britain claimed their efforts to compromise on the proposal of a new security council claiming the French President. Jacques chirk It was made clear that he would never agree.