Furious member of Parliamentary Committee that relates to national security The ministers have written to know why they were kept in darkness for three years. Afghan data breech,
Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) There is a statutory duty to maintain and investigate intelligence Case but it was not informed about it Data violationWhich was affected to 100,000 Afghans and the UK taxpayer for three years received an estimated £ 7BN.
The violation occurred when an anonymous officer, who was not dismissed, sent an email with a data sheet that he felt that there were 150 names that were to help them vacate because the Taliban was swept away to power. But instead there was a description of thousands of Afghans in the data which were then exposed.
In a letter to the ministers, the chairman of the committee, Lord Beamish, He has warned that there were no “any basis” to withdraw the information from him.
The committee is notorious secretly operated and does not reveal the sensitive issues discussed on it, as a means to ensure that Security Services are taken into consideration.
Ministers have also been ordered to issue sensitive papers on Afghan data violations, which put the life of 100,000 Afghans at risk and the government was given a cost of £ 7BN while a secret route was built for asylum.
In a statement released after the ISC received on Thursday morning, Labor Peer Lord Bimish said: “The committee has written for today’s need, the committee under the statutory powers is in the Justice and Security Act 2013, that the defense intelligence (DI) and the joint intelligence organization assessment is provided immediately, as well as any other intelligence assessment.”
He said: “The committee has also asked to provide the base with the Aadhaar, on which the government lawyer has advised the court that the material related to data loss cannot be shared with this committee, given that there is no classification or sensitivity to the justice and security act 2013, which can withdraw information from the ISC.”
Former Tory Defense Secretary Sir Ben Wallace Initially it has taken full responsibility for the decision to obtain prohibitory orders to prevent the publication of the details and initially.
His successor Sir Grant Shaps, Armed Forces Minister James HeP and former Prime Minister Rishi Sankar, who have taken care of the cover up, have made a public statement so far.
Labor Defense Secretary John Heli on Tuesday decided to raise the superinjunction to prevent publishing about data breech and even to prevent discussion, first ordered a review by Paul Rimmer.
Senior ministers have told Independent Regarding his “total shocks” when he was presented in the office last year with the facts of breech and super prohibition.
Independent Asked the mod for comment.