Kir Stamor Even after the ministers accepted, there is a harmful rebellion 150,000 people will still be pushed into poverty Improvement by benefits.
With the authority of the Prime Minister on the line, his work and pension secretary Liz Kendal unveiled the revised benefits To convince a bid improvement Labor Backbenchers not to vote for the bill in a crunch vote on Tuesday,
Outside the Commons, the plans were also strongly criticized by senior data including Manchester Mayor Andy Bernham and London Mayor Sadiq Khan. Mr. Bernham said: “The announcement made is half a U-turn, 50 percent U-turn. I think I hope MPs vote against the entire bill when the Parliament is revealed.”
Underlining the range of chaos, Bridget Philipson Emphasized that Sir Kir will lead labor in the next general election, In an interview with Independent A day ago Labor Marks its first year in power, Education secretary It also said that the government had “ups and downs” and suggested that better time was ahead.
More than 130 labor backbenchers An amendment was signed, which must have killed the law effectively-but the minister was expecting the final-print of the final-mortar to protect the current personal freedom payment (((Stool) And other changes will end the rebellion.
Ms. Kendal also promised to review PIP payment under the leadership of Minister of work and pension, Sir. Stephen Tims,
But before he spoke in the Commons, a government influence assessment confirmed that 150,000 disabled people would still be submerged in poverty under water measures-less than 250,000 threatened by manual schemes, but enough to offend many labor backbenchers and demanded that “early” laws have been withdrawn.
Work and pension committee chairman Debbie AbrahamOne of the prominent architects of the rebellion, did not refuse to vote against the bill.
Ms. Abraham, who spoke on the concessions of the last week with the Treasury Committee Chairman Dame Meg Hilier, suggested that the conversation that was held, suggested a rift on what was held.
Although he described the concessions as “good”, Ms. Abraham said that the rebel with the government on a deal was “not enough yet”.
“The real offer that was placed in one of the interaction team, in fact we thought we had conversation,” he said. “There are some issues around it.”
As the statement of Ms. Kendal was heard almost completely in the Commons, a succession of Labor MPs took her anger about the reforms on her feet and demanded that the bill be delayed until the completion of Tims review.
To add to labor crises, Ms. Kendal admitted that the profit cut would only save taxpayers £ 2.5bn – £ 4.8BN as not said earlier – presenting new questions on Chancellor Rachel Reves will balance the books.
As he spoke, two-thirds of the voters (63 percent) were revealed in the common published voting that labor was not trusted with disability benefits.
A Downing Street spokesperson refused to rule even more concessions as the labor backbencher stacked at pressure.
Talking to Commons, Ms. Kendal admitted that there were “real concerns” about the welfare reforms of the government, saying: “We have heard carefully, and we are making positive changes as the result.”
She says: “Now we will ensure that the need for a new four-point will be applicable only to new claims from November 2026. This means that due to further changes in this bill, no existing contenders will lose PIPs, and will also continue to receive the current contenders for careful allowances.”
In response to claims it will create a “two-level” Profit systemMs. Kendal said: “I would ask the House, including opposite members, that our profit system often protects the existing contenders from new rates or new rules, as life is created around that support, and it is often very difficult to accommodate people.”
However, Sarah Owen, the labor chair of the women and equality select committee, warned that before the Tims review is completed, proceeding with the bill “not only two levels but three levels can be given rise.”
Mary Tidball, a disabled labor MP seeking a delay in the law in the succession of MPs, attacked the government for lack of connection with disability groups.
He said: “This is not only about the process, it makes people disabled worse. The principle of fairness means that people with disabilities have a valid hope to consult, and the Equality Act Section 149 to meet the equality duty of the public sector.
“Why did the Department of Work and Pension not choose to consult with people with disabilities on PIP proposals, and what will its department do to win back the trust of people with disabilities?”
Stela Kreesi warned that proposals can “violate obligations from the United Nations Conference” on disability rights “.
However, the signingist of the rebel amendment, Josh Fenton-Gylin, MP of Calder Valley, praised the minister for “hearing” for criticisms.
