A Nurse Used to be struck off During an ambulance callout in 2020 to have sex with a patient.
Ian Tea Nele admitted to sexual intercourse with a weak Patient Whereas Take part in the address of their home On 24 October 2020.
Paramedic who worked Yorkshire ambulance services NHS TrustA health and care profession was found by the Tribunal Service Panel found “fundamentally incompatible with registration as health professionals”.
The panel heard how Mr. Nele attended the patient on two occasions on his own, the first on September 18 2020.
On 24 October 2020, the patient then played for an ambulance at 8 pm.
The panel heard that Mr. Nele admitted in a police interview during a police interview that he had consensual sex with the patient at his home address while participating in 999 calls.
He was accused of a criminal sexual offense, but was later acquitted of the crime in the test in August 2023, after denying conduct for alleged criminal offenses.
Giving evidence in the trial, he said he knew that the patient was weak.
The tribunal report states: “The registrar admitted to participating on the service user A on 24 October 2020 at his home address.
He said, “He participated in duty and uniform, for the ambulance service of the trust in response to the emergency 999 call of the service user A.
“The Registrar attended a fast -reaction vehicle in the house of service user A. of A. on 24 October 2020, admitted to having sexual intercourse with the service user A on that trip.
“In the trial transcript, the Registrar admitted that he had violated the trust’s code of conduct. Based on the entry of the registrar, the panel was satisfied on the balance of possibilities that the registrar allegedly had intercourse with the service user.”
Paramedics employed in the trust participated in the patient’s house the next day, where information about the presence of Mr. Nela was revealed and the trust was alerted. He was arrested and interviewed by the police on 28 October 2020.
The panel proved the allegations and decided to close Mr. Nele.
The panel concluded: “The panel concluded that the only appropriate and proportional approval in the case was a striking order.
“Allegations related to service user A were very serious. Given the paragraph 131 of the policy policy, the registrar did not demonstrate any real intentions or efforts to remove misconduct.
“There was a constant risk for the Registrar Service users and the public.
“The panel admitted that sexual misconduct found in this hearing was fundamentally incompatible with registration as a health professional on the HCPC register.”