Have you wondered why we sometimes starve in our headlines?
Like this:
And this:
Why are we doing this?
Is this because we are going?
Got soft?
Are we embracing the sensorship regime?
Some of you have told me (quite clearly very irrational and angry) that you have sent me!
Such from William (re -presented for the last name and email privacy purposes):
William is very crazy on me to use Esteris!
William is a “big boy” and does not require my censorship! And he is finishing the membership from my “pension” site!
I think it is “pansi” from William, but whatever it is.
So …. this is what we are doing?
Have we given a wake cava cave and are we trying to censors the news from people like William who are big boys and can read the headline with full sensor?
Okay, if you believe that you are not here for a long time or you do not know anything about my history or my character.
We do not do this.
It is not who we are.
So …. back to the main question: Why are we doing this?
This probably for a strategic reason, will you not agree?
And to be fair, I am sure most of you believe that because for every “William” that sends me a childish and immature email in this way, perhaps one of you is one of you who receives it. So perhaps I am preaching to those who play the song.
But I really wanted to address it and answer you why we do this.
And the answer is simple …. because there is a censorship brigade, but I am not censoring things with you. This is a big technique that is censoring me by reaching you!
You see, once we publish and article, it goes to one million different places.
It is shared on social media – Facebook, X, Telegram, Truthocial.
It also destroys our email newsletter, which many of you subscribe (Join here for free,
And what happens in all these, in places like Facebook and email companies have very large censorship techniques that scan for some words continuously and then removes you if you use them.
The list is long, but words like murder or murder or bombing or knife or hundreds of other words can immediately restrict you.
Suddenly, Mark Zuckerberg decided that he knew what you should do, it should be allowed to be seen better than this, so if the title of our article contains a restricted word and you try to post it on Facebook, the post may be shadow, or may be removed or sometimes the person trying to share it will also be sent to Facebook jail.
For email too … If an article has a restricted term in the headline and we include it in our email newsletter, then companies like Gmail and Yahumel and AOL and all the lines below will determine the line that they know you better what you are reading and they will send that email to their spam folder, or they will not allow it to be taken out.
All this is very real.
And it is getting spoiled.
So I have an option, and it’s like that Thomas Massey is in Congress …
I can choose to be an ultra prince and use banned words in my headlines without any editing and I will be so majestic and I will take a stand and people like “Big Boy” will be very happy! Because we were not caves for the awake crowd! He is a Massey approach. The royal and you win the battle but lose the war.
Or … I can take the Trumpian approach that has to play their game with their rules and defeat them in my game, so that I lost the war and I get an angry email from the “Big Boy” William, but at the end of the day I make my email newslator in your email inbox and you get to read all the news from that day.
Which of those two scenarios is the highest win?
I think you know where I stand.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
-Nuh
