Well, these are very wild people …
Those crazy conspiracy theorists are again on this, but can you blame them?
First he told us that they cannot control the weather.
Now they accept “yes we can, but only in small areas” and they call it cloud seeding.
Now the news has come to light that “Cloud Seeding Operation” took place in Texas two days before the recent flood, but if you make a relationship between those events you are clearly a conspiracy of a conspiracy:
Breaking: CEO of a Veder Modification Technology Company has confirmed that cloud seeding operations took place in Texas two days before the flood, which does not mean that they are connected.
– Leading Report (@Leadingreport) July 8, 2025
Yes, I really remember the old days in 2024 when everyone told me that Camatel and Cloud-seeding were not real!
Whatever happened to all that?
Now we are just accepting that it is real?
Apparently, according to the CEO of “Rainmaker” August Dorkeo-Irr, sorry… .. Ujustus Dorico, 25-year-old CEO of Cloud-Seeding Company Rainmaker.
Check it:
This man, Augustus Dorico, admits that his company controls the rainmaker season across the country. He talks about how you can make it a weapon, and explain that China has invested hundreds of million dollars in weather control technology. He even said that there should not be a rainmaker … pic.twitter.com/deahgmsl5l
– Nitz (@nickwalshnitz) July 6, 2025
And when he tells us that true weather control and weather attacks are not real, he also suggests that we cannot eliminate “not real” control of these weapons for China:
He says it’s a little earlier 6 minutes ago: pic.twitter.com/mukqnwhyyk
– Nitz (@nickwalshnitz) July 8, 2025
Sorry man, which is?
They are not real or can we probably not let China go to them?
Here is more Bloomberg,
According to Dorico, the Rainmaker flew from a brief 20-minute cloud seeding mission in South-Central Texas last Tuesday, but suspended all tasks on the same day due to unusually high moisture in the air. He said that two clouds sown during Tuesday flight would have spread after a few hours and there will be no effect on the flood after several days.
Cloud seeding involves using chemicals, often using silver iodide particles, so that the formation of ice crystals or drops from water can be triggered which is already present in a cloud but is not transporting it efficiently. Although the technique has been studied for decades, it is difficult to predict additional rainfall that cloud seeding operations can occur, in which estimate is widely widely.
It is clear that the technique will not be able to generate record-breaking rainfall seen in Texas. There was so much rain that the Gwadalup River in Kerville increased by 26 feet (8 meters) in less than one hour on Friday.
“Depending on the meteorological evidence, the flood of Texas was caused by a powerful natural weather system, with thunderstorms fed by very moist air from the hot bay of Mexico,” said the meteorological professor Andrew Charlton-Paries at the University of reading in the UK.
Here he is with Steve Bainon, judges his credibility for himself:
Augstus Dorico, CEO of a cloud seeding company, “Rainmaker” discussed the Texas flood.
His biggest project produced 10 million gallons of rain and said that he had no evidence that Cloud Seeding caused this horrific flood. Hurricane dumped 4 trillion gallons of water … pic.twitter.com/vkmj51nbb4– Bama_Jeans (@bamajayt) July 8, 2025
And with Tim Pool:
Rainmaker CEO Augustus Dorico defended his company against claims that its cloud seeding contributed to the Central Texas flood.
He said that the rainmaker did not work in the region on 3 or 4 July, and its last operation took place in about 150 miles south … pic.twitter.com/p6Jepxi5zo
– Post (@AFPOST) July 9, 2025
For those who want a TL/DR summary, here you go:
Severe floods in Texas: Deadly floods hit Texas in May 2024, causing significant damage and public concern.
Cloud seeding company includes: A company called Rainmaker Weather Technologies was contracted by local water districts for cloud seeding – a weather modification method that aims to increase rain by spreading substances in the air.
Principles of conspiracy spread: After the floods, the theorists of the conspiracy began blaming cloud seeding to produce or intensify storms, accusing them of manipulation or geo -engineering in the weather.
CEO speaks: Rainmaker CEO David Stuxbury denied the allegations in public, stating that the cloud seeding could not create a storm and only increases the existing clouds by a small percentage.
Scientific consent: Meteorologists and atmospheric scientists strongly rejected the idea that Cloud Seeding could produce such extreme weather, calling the allegations scientifically baseless.
Media misinformation: Social media posts, videos, and the affected raised false claims, including allegations that cloud seeding was being used for depression or war.
Rainmaker’s role is misunderstood: The company clarified that it only works with permission to increase rain during drought from local agencies and operates under strict rules.
State officials confirm security: Texas officials and facts reiterated that cloud seeding has been safely practiced in the state for decades and has nothing to do with the May flood.
Disbelief of government and science: The bounce in the principles of conspiracy refers to a broader tendency of public doubt towards official explanations, which is fuel by previous government privacy and mistrust in the media.
No link to Trump Administration: There is no connection between the Trump administration and floods or cloud seeding programs mentioned in these reports.
