WATCH: President Trump Is Telling You The Insurrection Act Is Coming!

Web Desk,

President Trump is telling you about as clearly as he can that invoking the Insurrection Act is coming soon!

Notice how every time he talks about the ANTIFA thugs in Portland he constantly refers to them as “Insurrectionists”…

He is building a case and getting that word and concept out into the public square so people are not caught off guard when he invokes the Insurrection Act.

After all, if people hear about “Insurrectionists” destroying our great cities for month after month, and then President Trump finally steps in to take action and clean things up by invoking the “Insurrection Act” it will make a lot of sense.

Watch this short clip from just this morning:

I’m not the only one picking up on this…

Check out what BioClandestine also posted today:

RELATED REPORT:

UPDATE: President Trump and Invoking The Insurrection Act

I think many of you are connecting the dots extremely well right now, but for anyone wondering “what is happening” I want to fill in the gaps.

Because I think it’s pretty clear exactly where we are going.

With the indictment of James Comey, raid and likely future indictment of John Bolton, and likely a lot more to follow, plus the deployment of troops to major blue cities across America, it seems fairly obvious that something BIG is coming.

And all credit to BioClandestine who I think put forth some excellent analysis and explanation on where we are going.

Trump’s plan is genius.

POTUS technically does not need to invoke the Insurrection Act to send US Military to defend federal property, it’s considered a federal function, NOT local policing.

So Trump can move troops to ICE facilities, have forces in place preemptively, then if he chooses to invoke the Insurrection Act, troops will already be in position, on standby.

The Insurrection Act would be needed if US MIL were to be engaged in riot control, general law enforcement, or quelling rebellion not on federal property.

Trump is putting himself in position so that if he does choose to invoke the Insurrection Act, he already has troops in place at areas of need, and can flip the switch at any moment from defense to offense.

My guess is that the decision is already made. Trump is getting his ducks in a row before he strikes, which is generally his modus operandi.

Battles are won before they begin.

And part 2:

For argument’s sake, let’s assume Trump and his administration end up following through with high-profile arrests of Deep State actors for treason/sedition.

There is a high probability that there would be some form of public backlash. The MSM will make their sheep riot.

Wouldn’t it make sense to have some sort of standing deterrent on-hand to deal with any uprisings or rebellion? Wouldn’t it be necessary to have security in place BEFORE any high-profile arrests can be made?

Food for thought as Trump begins to move US MIL troops to cities nationwide while high-profile actors like Comey are beginning to be indicted.

Some stars are aligning if you watch the moves on the chess board. Trump is setting the stage to save the Republic.

Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?

More confirmation here:

INSURRECTION ACT: President Trump Just Told You What’s Coming Next

President Trump just posted this to TruthSocial:

FULL TEXT:

The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation’s Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest – In just a few weeks. The “place” is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON’T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON’T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I’ll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT

Ok so what does it all mean?

ALSO READ  Where to get American-made overmectin at a price that you can't beat (6-Mahine Supplies!)

Very simply, he is putting all 50 states on notice that one way or another he is going to clean up the cesspools of crime and violence in this country.

The Mayors and Governors can either work together with him or he will do it himself — through the Insurrection Act.

This was already in play, but after the Charlie Kirk assassination I believe all restraints are off and our President has very little patience left.

WarClandestine agrees:

If you’ve been around here for a while, you know I’ve been telling you this was coming:

CHICAGO IS NEXT: President Trump About To Invoke The Insurrection Act?

In less than two weeks, President Trump has nearly entirely cleaned up Washington, DC.

And I keep telling you he’s getting ready to roll out that model to about 20 other major US cities.

In fact, I wrote about it pretty extensively right here:

Trump is Setting the Stage…

As usual, our reporting is spot on and President Trump himself basically just told you again that he is going to Chicago next.

He just posted this to TruthSocial today:

But….how would that work?

And would it be legal?

Yes, there is a legal framework for doing it.  It’s rarely used, but a good case can be made that it fits here.

I actually told you about it a few months ago right here:

REPORTS: President Trump Is Planning To Invoke The Insurrection Act!

Ok, buckle up folks because I’ve got a LOT to unpack here….

A lot of rumors are flying about what President Trump will or won’t do soon, and most of it centers around rumors that he will soon invoke these 18th century Presidential Powers like the “Wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1978” or the “Insurrection Act of 1807”.

We covered the first one earlier today:

President Trump Will Invoke Wartime Alien Enemies Act Of 1798

Now I want to dig into the other one, because they are, in fact, two totally different things, but rumors are flying about both and I’m seeing a lot of people conflating the two.

Here’s a quick summary:

Alien Enemies Act of 1798

  • Enacted: Part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, signed into law on July 6, 1798, by President John Adams.

  • Purpose: Allows the President to apprehend, restrain, and deport “alien enemies” (non-citizens from a country the U.S. is at war with) during a declared war.

  • Key Features: It applies only in wartime, targeting foreign nationals deemed a threat to national security. It does not involve military deployment domestically against U.S. citizens.

  • Current Status: Still technically in effect (codified in 50 U.S.C. § 21-24), though rarely used. It was notably invoked during World War I and World War II (e.g., internment of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals).

Insurrection Act

  • Enacted: Originally passed in 1807, with significant amendments over time (e.g., 1871 during Reconstruction).

  • Purpose: Authorizes the President to deploy federal military forces or federalize state militias within the U.S. to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or domestic violence when local authorities cannot maintain order.

  • Key Features: Focuses on domestic unrest, not foreign nationals. It can be used in peacetime or wartime and involves military action against U.S. citizens or residents if necessary.

  • Current Status: Codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, it remains in effect and has been invoked in cases like the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

Key Differences

  1. Scope: The Alien Enemies Act targets foreign nationals during wartime; the Insurrection Act addresses domestic unrest, regardless of citizenship.

  2. Military Use: The Insurrection Act explicitly involves military intervention, while the Alien Enemies Act focuses on detention and deportation without necessarily requiring military force.

  3. Trigger: The Alien Enemies Act requires a declared war; the Insurrection Act can be triggered by civil disorder or rebellion, even absent a formal war.

Rumors have swirled since the “Summer of Love” in 2020 that President Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act:

And quite frankly?  I think he should have during all the BLM and ANTIFA chaos.

ALSO READ  Breaking: Dead on Ozy Osbourne 76 | WLT Report

That’s exactly what it was made for.

But President Trump exercised extreme restraint and did not use it.

That’s our first clue as to whether or not President Trump might use it now in 2025….if he didn’t use it when BLM and ANTIFA were burning down major US Cities, is it likely he will use it now?  It could surely happen, but let’s just say I’m not fully convinced.

But Liberals are melting down:

So why is this coming up now?

Because of an Executive Order signed by President Trump on his first day in office back on January 20th titled: “DECLARING A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES”.

In that Executive Order was this paragraph:

(b) Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.

So to be fair, the Democrats aren’t freaking out for no reason….it turns out they actually read the Executive Order — or at least one person did and then it started going viral.

And that 90 day period is up on April 20th, but that’s just the deadline — it could happen earlier.  In fact, the report could already be on President Trump’s desk, we don’t know for sure.

Fox News had more analysis:

On his first day back in office, the president signed a litany of executive orders, including one declaring a state of emergency at the southern border.

According to the order, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security have 90 days to submit a report about the conditions at the border and any recommended actions that need to be taken to secure, “including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.”

Here’s what the act is, and what it could mean if invoked:

What is the Insurrection Act of 1807?

Dig deeper:

The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, told The Associated Press it’s an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

“It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he added.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

VP Vance Delivers Remarks at U.S.-Mexico Border

Vice President JD Vance toured the U.S.-Mexico border Wednesday, meeting with law enforcement to highlight immigration policies that the White House says have led to fewer arrests since Trump’s second term. Accompanied by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard, Vance is among the highest-ranking Republicans to visit the border. After a helicopter tour of Eagle Pass, they visited a Border Patrol facility and joined a roundtable discussion.

Past use of the Insurrection Act

The backstory:

Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state’s governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out.

George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped.

Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?

Almost anything and everything is on the table during a Trump presidency.

Big picture view:

He’s already fired top Pentagon officials and military lawyers, leading some critics to say the firings are an ominous sign, given that Trump has long made clear his desire to involve the military in his domestic policy goals, including his crackdown on immigration.

In Congress, which has the power to restrict the use of military force through funding and other authorizations, Republicans are largely on board with Trump’s plans.

The other side:

Democrats in Congress tried to update presidential powers like the Insurrection Act before Trump’s second term but found little success.

That left them instead issuing dire warnings that Trump now has fewer guardrails on how he could use the military. He has shown an ability to bend institutions to his goals, from a Supreme Court willing to reconsider long-standing interpretations of presidential powers to a military scrubbed of officers and leaders likely to push back on his plans.

Newsweek had more on what we’re hearing from key figures:

What People Are Saying

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a recent statement: “The drop in illegal border crossings has been fantastic: 95% since President Trump took office. We’ll keep our military at the border until it is entirely closed.”

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday: “In February, there were just 8,326 apprehensions at the U.S. Mexico border. That is lowest number in recorded history. President @realDonaldTrump has delivered a powerful message and the world is taking notice: America’s borders are CLOSED to lawbreakers.”

President Donald Trump, in a March 4 address to Congress: “The territory to the immediate south of our border is now dominated entirely by criminal cartels that murder, rape, torture and exercise total control. They have total control over a whole nation. posing a grave threat to our national security.”

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian and political commentator, on X on Friday: “Americans, Trump is apparently now considering the invocation of the Insurrection Act. He has asked Hegseth & Noem to weigh in on the issue. Autocrats use such measures to speed power consolidation, repress protests and demonstrate force to the world.”

White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Politico in February: “After four years of a lackadaisical approach to border security and immigration, every lever of executive power is now being marshaled to enforce our laws, mass deport criminal illegal immigrants, safeguard our borders, and put American citizens first.”

Brett Wagner, a retired professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College, in an opinion piece in the San Francisco Chronicle on Wednesday: “Many of us are now holding our collective breath, knowing that the report and what it contains could put us on the slippery slope toward unchecked presidential power under a man with an affinity for ironfisted dictators.”

Here’s a deeper analysis on how likely this is to happen:

The Insurrection Act (codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) grants the president broad authority to deploy federal troops under certain circumstances. Below is an organized overview of the conditions, practical scenarios, administrative steps, political justification, and the likelihood analysis regarding its potential invocation by Trump.

Legal Triggering Conditions

For the Act to be invoked, the president must determine that an “insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” exists. This determination typically falls into one of two categories:

  • State-Requested Intervention (§ 251):
    When a state is unable to enforce its own laws and formally requests federal assistance from its legislature or governor.

  • Federal Law Enforcement Impediment (§ 252–253):
    When domestic disturbances hinder the execution of federal laws or infringe on constitutional rights to the extent that ordinary judicial processes become impracticable.

Additional Note:
No formal congressional approval is required; however, the president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying troops (§ 254).

Practical Scenarios

Several potential scenarios might provide a pretext for invoking the Act:

Administrative Steps

The decision-making process would likely involve several key actions:

Political Justification

To justify such a drastic measure, Trump would need to frame it as a necessary response to a crisis:

  • Rhetorical Framing:
    • Emphasizing “law and order” and national security, as seen in his March 4, 2025, congressional address.
  • Selling to the Base and Public:
    • The move would be presented as decisive leadership during a time of crisis, aligning with his history of strong executive actions.

Historical Precedents

  • 1992 Los Angeles Riots:
    • The Act was invoked during the riots under President George H.W. Bush.
  • Enforcement of Desegregation (1957):
    • President Eisenhower also relied on the Act to enforce desegregation.

While the threshold is not exceedingly high, historical uses of the Act have been tied to acute, visible disorder.

Likelihood Analysis

Supporting Factors

ALSO READ  Credit card loan rapidly tackle - By paying 0% interest by 2027. WLT Report

United States