FRayDay night brought flicker for almost all – bar Benjamin NetanyahuExtreme rights, war – Monging Cabinet Minister – have been desperate for. News of a ceasefire, and a possible plan to free Gaza This has happened in the last two years from the slaughterhouse.
Hamas temporarily Welcome Donald TrumpEfforts to end the destructive war, as well as efforts of international community and Arab states.
On 7 October 2023, the terrorist group responsible for the bloody attacks, all the remaining 48 bounds in Trump’s 20-Bindu scheme, died and the survivors were agreed to release “according to the exchanges formula”.
This, he said, “will be done in this way that ends the war”. Benjamin NetanyahuLast week supports Trump’s plan, with his interpretations.
So, is it a moment that is dreaming of millions and campaigning? End of mass slaughter in Gaza? For two years long nightmare for Israeli hostages and families of prisoners? The end of a region-wide war that has pushed the world to the brink?
Trump, who has campaigned as Shanti President and monitored the Nobel Peace Prize – certainly thinks: “Based on the statement issued simply HamasI believe they are ready for a permanent peace. Israel should stop the bombing of Gaza immediately, so that we can take the hostage safe and quickly! It is not about Gaza alone, it is about long -standing peace Middle East“He wrote on the truth social.
Satan, however, is in detail (as usual). And till now, neither Netanyahu nor Hamas has agreed to every specific point in the scheme. Instead, both have publicly announced their interpretations of the proposal and vow to support it.
The problem is that the 20-point scheme is unclear. So vague, in fact, that it has allowed Trump, Netanyahu, Hamas and major figures to effectively release and promote its interpretations.
The statements with each endorsement paint are with such different pictures, you wonder if they were looking at the same document. And this, I am afraid, the issue would be when it is actually trying to implement it and will get a lot of demand after peace.
For a beginning, Hamas said this evening that it would be ready to hand over to all hostages and prisoners within 72 hours, a significant success -that it would open to discuss the details immediately.
Responding to Trump’s plan, it welcomed Israel’s “full return” with the Gaza Strip, exchanges of Palestinian prisoners, immediate entry of aid, rejection of the strip possession, and rejection of the Palestinian people’s forced displacement.
Hamas also said that it was prepared to hand over a Palestinian body of independent technocrats to Gaza’s administration as mentioned in Trump’s document.
But importantly he also said that Hamas Palestinian would be a part of the “national structure” and “with full responsibility” would contribute “. In other words, Hamas is just not going to disappear.
Fueling the fire is the fact that Trump’s plan has no provision or guarantee for the creation of Palestinian state.
Instead of confusing to some extent-it suggests that after removing Hamas, if the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority in the West Bank is “improved”, it is allowed to return to some role of power, “circumstances may finally be for Palestinian self-determination and a reliable route for the state”.
But again: no guarantee. In a press conference, announcing the plan last week, Netanyahu jumped on it. He said that he welcomed Donald TrumpIn the context of a Palestinian state rejection, and that in the context of the October 7 attacks, “rewarding terrorists, reducing security, and endangered the existence of Israel”.
He also added some more cavets, including PA’s “reforms”, which is not listed in Trump’s 20-point proposal-as the International Criminal Court abolish the “Lofare” against Israel, the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Court and the International Court of Court (in other words), preventing the instigation in the media, and the PA recognizes a “Jewish state”.
Once again, we are looking at the interpretations of a vague text that are directly opposite each other.
The question is: Can these unequal statement-focal-picketing and unclear 20-point can explain various aspects of the scheme-translate into meaningful, long-term peace?