It is going to be very controversial …
And I am also a little disputed on this, so let me only allow me to tell what is going on and then I will give you my current stream-off-consciousness thoughts now.
A website has become live called Charliesmurderers.com, who claims to track and document all disgusting and politically violent comments about Charlie Kirk after his assassination.
It has already collected more than 50,000 submissions and is growing very fast.
See it here: https://www.charliesmurderers.com
Homepage starts with it:
The website is clearly connected to this X Account,
About this The page of the website clarifies that it is not a doorsing website, but a “valid data aggregator or publicly available information”.
It is not a docksing website.
This website is a valid data aggregator of publicly available information. It is designed for the purposes of public education.
We want to gather and collect examples of individuals who promote or glorify political violence, much like Archive.org or Archive. We all condemn political violence and criminal activities strongly.
This website is being converted into a large -scale searching database of over 20,000 entries.
Our thoughts and prayers are with the family of Charlie Kirk.
I think this is a very important difference.
I will never support Doxing. If someone is private and does not voluntarily put his identity online, that privacy should not be violated. Especially in today’s world, where you can be murdered in your neck because someone disagrees with you, doxing can be fatal.
But it is not what this website does.
This does not reveal those who tried to be private, it only posts and documents posting to those who voluntarily posted Vile, disgusting comments about Charlie Kirk online.
If you want to post hatred like this, it only makes me feel appropriate that you should not try and run away from it later. Internet is written in ink.
Although I will expose an exception, but it seems that some submissions are screenshots of private DM or private text messages and I do not support people to be made public without the consent of another person.
Now to address the free speech question, because I can already hear it.
“But what about the free speech, Noah? I felt that you have supported the constitution and 1 amendment! Pakhandi! You support these people being removed from their jobs because they said something? What happened to the free speech?”
I support free speech, perhaps more and more you know anyone.
And this is not limited to free speech in any way.
All these 50,000 people have the right to say these things and post them online.
But… .Pri speech does not protect you from all results.
If I go to my boss at work and I say “Hey boss, I just wanted to tell you that you have a big old fat, ugly face that wants me to barf every time and I want you to shoot in the neck!” – I will probably be immediately fired from that job.
I do not claim that “free speech” protects my job!
No it is not.
This prevents you from throwing you in jail on words from the government.
Also, while I think the free speech should be absolute, our Supreme Court has ruled that it is not, and there are also exceptions to the first amendment where you do not get empty checks to say anything and whatever you want. There are boundaries. And there are results.
so there you go!
To know what you think…. Do you support this website?