President Trump told Iran that he would strike within the next two weeks if he did not agree to complete surrender – and obviously he determined that this would never happen and the risks of continuing waiting were very great.
Preliminary voting shows support for attacks on President Trump and 63% and I hope it will only climb over time:
There is a lot in the flux right now, but here we all have a quick summary that we know till now:
To say that the strikes were successful, it is clearly an understanding because President Trump reports that Fordo is not just damaged, but has gone:
Strike is being seen at Washington at any time, which is being seen the most operating security people:
There is no soldier on the ground.
No rule.
No “struggle” forever.
Just did another, inside and out.
End.
If you wanted to go even deeper, I felt that it is an excellent summary for someone who likes to watch the video:
Donald Trump only killed Iran.
Three atomic sites have been killed – Esfhan, Natanj and Fordo.
Now, Donald Trump says that all American airplanes are now in a safe place outside the Iranian airspace. My expectation, as is more than the last few days, is that Donald Trump will actually never declare that these attacks are going to happen, as they will endanger the US -American mission.
It seems that the mission is now complete.
It is very interesting here that now we have hit the features that have already been killed twice – or actually many times – by Israeli. About a day of this infiltration, Natanz has been repeatedly killed. This is one of your uranium enrichment sites.
Esfahan is also a promotion place, but the unique about Esfahan is a storage feature for rich uranium – at least it is the place where it was last seen by IAEA inspectors, who were reportedly inspecting nuclear sites within Iran several times per day, until the Israeli strikes started.
Now Fordo, as far as we are aware and said, have not yet been killed by Israelis. But this morning, we put a video together that the Israeli army was clearing the way from the Persian Gulf to the south of Iran – and there is a possibility that where the United States aircraft would enter the Iranian airspace, possibly from Qatar or Saudi Arabia Peninsula, or elsewhere.
All this now aligns that there are attacks today.
Obviously, this is Saturday – this is a weekend – bitcoin is approximately 101, just below its 102 support line. So we are seeing some negative market feedback.
This means that the United States has set foot in this war of Iran vs. Israel.
And now there are questions – is it?
Donald Trump suggests that the next best phase is a peaceful next stage. That is – hopefully we can return to peace.
These Alpha reports were in my scenarios with members of my course in the report, and we have also talked about it on the channel. So my best case, when we establish a trading scenario, we are right-that’s it, is it right?
For example, we can say, “Hey, if the circle goes down in the first five minutes of business, be ready to take a bounce on it as it can shoot up to 20%.”
This is what happened on Friday, for example. You can see its history – you can see in Alpha Report, History of It, Course Members Live Stream.
But the issue is, we gave landscapes for the best-case scenarios.
The best-case landscape number one was a solution to a conversation-obviously, some forms of capitulation from Iran, that they would stop enriching before attacks from the United States.
Khamenei clearly made it clear this morning that the conversation in Geneva was not acceptable-as well as allotment of replacement to other people of the Iranian Army and the Iranian revolutionary guard should be allocated and thrown out-Iran actually suggested heel-dining.
This idea: “Okay, look, we are not going on zero enrichment. These deals that were being introduced in Geneva are not good. We are not interested in these dialogues, so we are just going to establish and excavate here.”
Unfortunately, it came at the same time when we were bringing more B -2 bombers to the region.
Therefore, inadvertently, the talks were not going anywhere and we were originally walking towards these strikes – which are now officially done.
Now, we have talked about Esfahan – we do not know if the 15 barrels of highly rich uranium are actually in the Esfahan.
We do not know if they are now destroyed through bombs that have fallen the United States.
It is expected that the United States is originally coming as an MOP-up crew.
So in other words, we are striking in such a way that Israel cannot.
Israelis Anti-Aircraft launchers such as Sam-Surface-to-Air Missile features or vehicles out-and then also create a way for B-2 bombers.
B -2 bombers fuel from the coast of Iran -very common. Yes, a B-2 bomber is fully loaded without bombs-in second words, can make fuel without bombs in Iran from a significant distance without bombs.
However, once you are carrying a 30,000 lb bombs, it is a bit different.
Now we have to wait and see what kind of footage comes out of the actual bombing.
But Donald Trump suggests that these attacks have been successful.
I suspect that there was a possibility to hit three different sites in the neighborhoods-we are probably looking somewhere among 6 to 12 B-2 bombers that were used in this attack.
Each two bombs as well as potentially F-16, which we have already seen in Saudi Arabia, can work in the United States and allied forces.
So what does this mean?
Well, we talked to Esfahan – some of the possibly rich uranium, it was not transferred, now destroyed.
Generally, rich uranium is not considered a nuclear threat to the result objectives – so there is a concern there.
Natanz has already been very heavy bombing, so it is likely that the bus is over.
Now strike on Fordo – We are now talking for about a week – it should be, depending on what we are hearing, the first strike on the Fordo, and it is basically the initial strike and the final strike.
So now the question is-first the best-case landscape was a solution to a conversation before the strike.
The second best-case landscape is a solution to a conversation after the strike.
Now what we are expecting – and regret that if I have food in my teeth, I really stepped out of a wedding because I saw these attacks – so what happens when you have information for the truth social – and a shout for the team as well as, “Kevin, are you on it?”
Anyway, so now the first case did not work landscape – the conversation solution before the strike – this did not happen.
The Best Next case landscape solution is a post-system solution.
This is where Iran originally says, “Okay look, we have gone out. We give up. We will go to zero enrichment.”
Because again, you have to remember – and I think it is boring, like science – but you have to understand:
If you enrich U-235 for peaceful purposes, you can also use that U-235 for weapons.
You cannot start a atom-a peaceful nuclear program-you cannot initiate fragmentation reactions without a U-235.
You may have a bunch-you may have 97% U-3 -238-but you need 3% U-235. Therefore you need that 235 nuclear power grade and weapon grade uranium, which you have to refine through centrifugal processes.
Even in a peaceful program, plutonium U-239- Sorry, plutonium 239-can also be used in weapons.
Therefore the component in a peaceful energy program can be used for weapons.
The sub -product of a peaceful energy program can be used in weapons.
And then obviously, you can only use U-235 directly for weapons.
So now the best-case scenario Iran is back and says: “Okay, we are doing. We will not be rich anymore. You got us. You gave us a tough competition.
Many people are asking me – how could they be killed potentially?
Because it is not just the 2D surface to know where to strike – where a detective basically paints a location, coordinates a GPS, and you attack that location.
This is also the third dimension to know how deep it has to go.
You have to get possible false cavities, through false tunnels – and you have to make sure that the bomb does not go far.
Otherwise even a 30,000 pound bomb-which is mostly metal, 25,000 pounds have its metal, 5,000 pounds of real warheads-you will actually have to target at the correct three-dimensional depth.
I suspect that it is likely that the satellite in the United States was imagined when these sites were built and originally went to the archives to say, “Oh okay, yes, yes we know what is really happening.”
And thus these strikes were successfully done.
Now again, we also have to evaluate – were the attacks really successful?
Because Trump everything is successful – well, his words – so we have the kind of salt that has to be taken with a small grain of salt.
But for a moment assume that the strikes were not successful – very embarrassing for Donald Trump.
It is possible that Iran may argue that the strikes were not successful.
And it will go into a third-case scenario-which is not one of our first or second best-case scenarios-this is the worst position.
And this is a situation where Iran says: “Your attacks have failed. You did not find our goods. Now we are definitely making a bomb.”
This is bad – because it potentially leads to a long war, prolonged war or conflict.
And then, of course, the worst condition number four four to verify by the US-or-Commando-supported deployment is some form of deployment of real contingent to verify or verify-to verify that the job is completed and Iranians are not enriched uranium.
Notice – Whatever I am saying is any change in governance.
You do not want to change governance.
Because then you have – we have talked a lot about this, I am sorry, I think it is fruitless – as soon as possible:
If you take out a regime, you leave a power vacuum.
Who is going to change it?
Are you going to the elections held in Iraq in any way? Nobody trusts the election.
Are you going to bring the Israeli army into a position? No one is going to trust or believe them – and you have found a Gaza 2.0 – no one wants this.
Are you going to take an American-assigned government? Nobody wants this.
Therefore, people will have to choose the government and trust that election process – this has not been done just successfully.
What is better that governance find out: “Okay, we are not going to enrich uranium. We step back.”
So now the question is how bad the response is?
And this is what we have to see.
Hopefully, attacks – actually now that they are out – hopefully the attacks were really successful.
If they were really successful, yes – we can get to solve a conversation.
If Iran is open to this – then hope.
Because if not, we fall into a situation where more than 100 oils touch the sky – possibly we take vengeance in the straight of the hormuz.
And now we are in a situation where the oil is more than 100, more than 125 – we start landing in the field of recession on the basis of purchasing power, where going into an environment where employment is already very weak.
Now this is not the level of existing unemployment – it will be the level of hiring. Renting is very weak. The vacancies of the job are weak.
So this is a thick time – it is a sensitive time – trying to further absorb such damage to the economy.
So I just have to wait and see what happens.
Follow for more. I will keep you updated.
thank you so much.
