parent of Natasha adenan-leparhouse It is said that his daughter would be “very proud” how the change in the food labeling law is now saving life, four years after its start.
15 -year -old Natasha died of Fulham in West London, after a serious allergy response in July 2016, a Mangar was baked in Betuate. Ellergen was not listed as a component on packaging, nor was it visible.
His parents Later campaigned for new lawAll food outlets are required, providing full component list and allergic labeling for fully created items and packed on the site for direct sale.
Natasha is confirming life that the founders of the allergic Research Foundation, Tanya and Nadim Adnan-Leapras, are confirming that life is affecting life.
Charity has called Natasha Day on 1 October – the time to celebrate the “legacy of change” of the teenager.
His parents said in a statement: “Natasha’s law gives more protection to millions of people living in Britain. food allergiesAllows them to buy food and eat out with more confidence.
“Everyone must be able to consume food safely. Natasha will be very proud of the ongoing influence, on the life of people with food allergies on Natasha’s law.”
Charity shared stories of people that have been influenced by law changes, including kitty Clarke, 21, who are allergic to eggs, dairy and kiwi fruits.
He said: “Natasha’s law has changed my life in so many ways – in ways that are insignificant to most people, but for someone with severe food allergies, these changes make the world of differences.
“The first time I saw that Natasha’s rule came into force, when I picked up a box of Sushi and saw that the material was printed on the back.
“Something that will not pay attention to anyone, but for me it means that I did not have to convince the tired member of my food, check if the food was safe to eat and each time it was surprised that I bought it whether the recipe had changed.
“I got confidence after seeing the printed materials.
“Natasha’s law completely changed my relationship with food.
“It has also changed the attitude towards food allergies. Now that I bring my food allergies to the cafe, or in the server, or new colleagues or new friends, their reactions are no longer one of the confusion, but of understanding and awareness.”
17 -year -old Jayden Polay, who is allergic to milk, said: “Before presenting Natasha’s law, my mother would not allow me to eat anything from bakers and sandwiches shops because labeling could not be trusted.
“When we went out for the day as a family, we will always have to have a pack lunch for me so that we could ensure that the food was safe for me.
“Since the onset of Natasha’s law, things are very easy. Sandwich shops and bakery are now an option for me and printed allergies always feel very safe than me to trust employees.
“I can be too comfortable and a normal life is more freedom to live safely – I don’t need to plan what I already eat, take food with me all the time, or go home quickly because I need to eat.”
The 22 -year -old Jesse Floom has fatal allergies from eggs, all nuts, all seeds, chocolate, grains, kiwi and dairy.
He said: “For me, food has never been simple. Something that most people take – holding a breakfast, eating with friends, going to a cafe – have always felt like stepping into danger.
“Even the smallest trace, the smallest cross-oppression, can send me to a serious, life-threatening response. I feel that every piece of food I eat can give me a response to life-threatening.
“Before Natasha’s law, eating outside was not just difficult, it was almost impossible.
“The menu were unclear, the packaging rarely gave me the information I needed, and many times I met the confused staring when I asked the employees about the material …
“Since Natasha’s law has come into force, something has changed … clear and honest labeling means that I no longer live with fear that the food packed is somewhat dangerous.”