Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
President Trump recently won another major victory from the Supreme Court.
I believe this brings his winning streak to 29 wins in 9 months?
Incredible.
To keep an eye:
🚨 BREAKING – Supreme Court sides with Trump: Rules administration won’t have to pay SNAP during government shutdown for now
Good!
SNAP is rife with fraud. It’s time for a massive change in programming, and there will be no more dessert cakes, sugary junk, luxury coffee, etc. pic.twitter.com/PBpXSRfiS2
– Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) 8 November 2025
Even more incredible is the fact that far-left Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson was the judge who issued the order.
Let’s just say liberals aren’t handling this well:
Ketanji Brown Jackson was the judge who approved Trump’s appeal to halt SNAP payments during the government shutdown.
Liberals are falling on TikTok pic.twitter.com/COEDUWBqI0
– Digital Gal 🌸 (@DigitalGal_X) 8 November 2025
cnn More details shared:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Friday temporarily blocked a lower court order requiring the Trump administration to cover full food stamp benefits for millions of Americans in November, siding with the administration on a short-term basis in a legal battle that has quickly become a defining confrontation of the government shutdown.
The result is that the US Agriculture Department will not have to immediately honor a lower court order requiring it to transfer $4 billion to a key food aid program by the end of the day. This decision, while temporary, could jeopardize full benefits for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to support themselves and their families.
The order does not resolve the underlying legal questions raised by the case — and the Trump administration has already committed to using the program’s contingency funds to partially pay benefits. Rather, Jackson’s “administrative stay” prohibits any additional action by the administration to give the appeals court additional time to review the case.
Jackson is a judge appointed to handle emergency appeals from the First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The legal fight over food stamps has emerged as a central pressure point between all three branches during the historically long government shutdown because it is one of the easiest to understand and the most tangible effects of that standoff so far. At stake is food aid on which some 42 million Americans depend.
It’s unclear how the case will ultimately affect the billions of dollars spent in federal SNAP funding.
The true irony here is that while the leftists scream “No Kings”, that is exactly what they wanted…
Leftists are using “kings” disguised as activist district court judges to impose their will on the entire country.
the only problem?
The Supreme Court keeps telling them it is unconstitutional.
No king really.
Here is the court’s full order:
And it may be a little hard to read so here is the full text:
Supreme Court of the United States
Number 25A539
Brooke L. Rollins,
Secretary of Agriculture, et al.,
V
Rhode Island State Council of Churches, et al.
Order
The applicants are seeking a stay of two orders in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, case number 1:25-cv-569. D. See CT. Minute Entry (October 31, 2025) and Docket No. 34 (November 6, 2025). These orders require applicants to fully commit Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”) benefits for the month of November and distribute that funding by the end of the day on November 7, 2025 (today).
Earlier today, the applicants asked the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to issue an administrative stay of the District Court’s orders pending appeal and to facilitate consideration of that stay motion. At 6:08 p.m., the First Circuit denied the applicants’ request for an administrative stay, but said it “intended”[s] to issue a decision on [the stay pending appeal] Take action as soon as possible.” Rhode Island State Council of Churches v. RollinsNo. 25-2089 (CA1 Nov. 7, 2025).
The applicants filed an application with this Court this evening requesting a stay of the two District Court orders, “pending the disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and, if the Court of Appeals affirms those orders, until the timely filing and disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari in this Court.” On application 1. The applicants claim that, without this Court’s intervention, they would have to “transfer an estimated $4 billion by tonight” to fund SNAP benefits through November. Same.
Given the First Circuit’s representations, an administrative stay is needed to facilitate expeditious resolution of the First Circuit’s pending stay motion.
It has been ordered That the orders of the District Court be administratively stayed until the disposition of the motion for stay by the undersigned or further orders of the Court pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Case No. 25-2089. This administrative stay will expire forty-eight hours after the First Circuit’s resolution of the pending motion, which the First Circuit is expected to issue with dispatch.
/S/ Ketanji Brown Jackson
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
of the united states
date 7th
Day of November, 2025.