A man who was named “con Queen” Hollywood“A court bid has been lost to challenge the officers of the film and cheat hundreds of people after alleged. Extradition To the United States.
Hargobind is Tahilramani Accused of winning more than 300 victims – In seven years, including actors, screenwriters and photographers.
Tahilramani will allegedly convince professionals of entertainment industry to travel Indonesia At your own expense for non-existent projects.
He was then reportedly spent on them which were never repaid.
Is 45 year old Wanted to face eight allegations in AmericaWire fraud conspiracy, two cases of wire fraud and increased five cases are included Identification of theft,
He faced extradition proceedings in 2022, and in June 2023, Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring approved the extradition of Tahilramani, which was later ordered by the Home Secretary.
Tahilramani appealed High court In April in London.
Judge Mr. Justice Sweeting dismissed the bid in a decision on Tuesday.
The lawyers of Tahilramani argued that the Chief Magistrate was wrong to allow his extradition, given their mental health and the risk of suicide.
He also said that the judge was wrong to find out that extraditing Tahilramani would be compatible with his human rights, which is at risk of inhuman and derogatory treatment, including sexual harassment.
Mr. Justice Sweeting said in the 28-hit judgment: “The case of the applicant is that he will definitely face imprisonment alone in protective custody due to his sexual orientation and reinforced performance.”
The judge found that any difference in the treatment of Tahilramani could be in jail, it would be aimed at preventing inter-genuine violence, and that the previous judge was correct to conclude that it would “be oppressive due to his physical or mental state”.
Mr. Justice Sweeting concluded: “The difference treatment claimed by the applicant, even if established, would be related to protective measures taken due to vulnerability, not as a result of discriminatory intentions or practice based on his sexual orientation.
“Such measures … are not inhuman or derogatory and serve a valid objective within the US penal system.”
