Trump administration officials who celebrate arrest Kilmar Abrego Garcia There may be enough “direct proof” Throw a criminal case According to a federal judge, for the wrongly exiled Salvadoran immigrants, for “anti -counter” prosecution.
The judge took care of him criminal prosecution Argued that the government brought a case against him for “Vandana” reasons and would pronounce more evidence before reaching the final decision whether it has to be completely dismissed.
Attorney for Abrego Garcia Argued His high-profile legal battle by the administration officials was “out” in vengeance, which challenges his wrong arrest and removes a cruel salvadoron gel.
Despite accepting in court that he was disarmed in March in March, government lawyers and top administration officials spent weeks that Abrego Garcia would not be allowed to return to the country. He was returned to the United States to face only a criminal prosecution in June, which was accidentally introduced weeks after being deported.
According to the Tennessy District Judge Waverly Cresho, the possible evidence of that retaliatory prosecution includes the statements of Homeland Security Secretary Christie Nom and Attorney General Palm Bondi and his subordinates.
But “most clearly,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blaunch admitted “strike” in a Fox News interview that the prosecutor in Maryland was “investigating” after interrogating the administration and accused the government of doing something wrong, “Creanshaw said.
“To remove any doubt, Deputy Attorney General Blaunch said that the criminal case was brought to withdraw [Abrego Garcia] For the United States, “Craneshaw wrote.” This may be a direct evidence of directness. ,
The judge said that the “remarkable statements” of the blanch to sue the government “to practice its constitutional and statutory rights” may be sufficient to establish inspiration for criminal cases against him for the practice of his constitutional and statutory rights “to be considered illegal vengeance for the practice of his constitutional and statutory rights,” said the real desire for alleged criminal misconduct, “said the judiciary.
This time also suggests a “realistic possibility” that senior officials of the Department of Justice and Homeland Security Department may “motivate the federal prosecutors” to charge Abrego Garcia in retaliation for Maryland’s trial.
The judge said that more clear hearing will reach the bottom of those questions.
Abrego Garcia is overwhelmed in Federal Court cases At the center of the anti -immigration agenda of Donald Trump.
He remains in immigration and customs enforcement custody as he wants to reopen his immigration case to request asylum in the United States. Taking care of the case, the judge of the immigration court refused to request his request this week; Abrego Garcia has 30 days to appeal.
In August, his lawyers admitted that the motions are rarely provided to dismiss criminal cases on the basis of selective or denovative prosecution, but “if ever there has been a case for dismissal on those grounds, it is that case.”
“The government is trying to use the case – and this court – to successfully punish Mr. Abrego to fight their illegal removal. This is the most basic violation of the most basic type of violation,” he said.
In a two-tail prosecution in Tennessi, Abrego Garcia is accused of participating in a one-year-long conspiracy, which is to smuggle illegally unspecified unrighteous immigrants from Texas to other parts of the country. He faces a count of conspiracy to transport aliens and is a count of illegal transport of unspecified aliens.
But in his request to keep him in jail before the test, the federal prosecutors also claimed that he was a member of the Transnational Gang MS -13, and “individually participated in a violent crime, including the murder.”
The prosecutors also claimed that they “misbehaved” women and smuggled children, firearms and intoxicants, and there was also an investigation in “insistence of child pornography”.
Abrego Garcia is not facing any allegations on those allegations and Judge Krench first ruled that the government The allegations failed to connect the evidence that reflects him.