There are increasing apprehensions Kim leadbatter’s assisted dyeing bill The next week can be defeated when returning to the Commons, as MPs claim that trust is losing rapidly.
Comes as warning MS leadbatter On Friday, their first major defeat faced when MPs voted to introduce new security measures to prevent health professionals from increasing the subject. Helped dying With children.
He voted in favor of 259 and 216 against an amendment by Labor MP Lady Me Hillier “No health professional will help die with a person under the age of 18”.
It is understood that Ms. Leadbuter did not support the amendment as she agrees to the British Medical Association, stating that doctors should not be kept in a position where they are stopped from increasing it with patients.
It is amid concerns that if people under the age of 18 with terminal diseases are unable to receive the advice from their doctor, they will turn to the Internet, where they are more likely to be subject to misinformation.
Labor MP Paul Waugh told Independent Today’s voting suggests that the bill “has lost the trust of MPs rapidly”, saying that “strong pace against it is now clear”.
“Last November had a Commons majority of 56. It was up to 36 on a major amendment last month. Today, we made another cut on the amendment by 21 and 26.
Mr. Waugh said: “The higher the investigation of this particular bill, the more MPs are deeply concerned about the lack of security measures for the weaker people.”
But sources close to Ms. Leadbatter stressed that there was no reason to believe that the speed was losing, indicating that the decline in prominence resulted in a result of participation in the debate as a result of low MPs. It is understood that Ms. leadbutter believes that support for this is strong.
Kit Malthaouse, who supported the bill, said: “The evidence from today is that our number is strong. Our majority were proportional to the same. On one vote, where a fine decision was required, obviously the views’ views were different. But if anything happened, probably will strengthen their trust to vote for the bill, supported us in other votes.”
Danny Kruger, who has been an outspoken rival of the bill, said that he is “expecting rapidly” it will be voted next week.
He said, “Jowar is starting the suicide bill.” While he described the success of amendment to prevent health professionals from increasing the subject of dying with children as a “big win”, he warned that the bill is “still very open to misuse”.
Rachel Maskal, who is against the bill, said: “It is clear that now MPs are engaged in the expansion of the bill that they can see cracks and are losing confidence”.
“A very different picture was painted today when the bill was passed with 56 votes in the autumn with 56 votes, which today is for amendment of 43 votes against the wishes of the Bill’s sponsor. MPs now need to engage with evidence that clearly determine why this special bill is not fit for purpose”, he said. Independent.
But the supporters-supported sources said that people from both sides of the debate voted to support additional security measures for the children.
Arguing the amendment, a medical doctor Dr. The Neel-Shastri-Hest MP said: “Those who have the privilege of meeting a young man living with terminal disease, will know that they often show a maturity and depth of understanding beyond their years.
“It is not my view of compassion to deny an idea of an idea about their future when they reach adulthood; it is to leave them.
“This is to isolate them, instead of interacting with reliable, qualified professionals, navigate a complex and deep personal journey through online forum filters. We consider them better than this.”
Rai in the medical community is divided on the bill, expressing concern with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and the Royal College of Psychiatrics (RCPSCH), while some MPs who are doctors are among the strongest supporters of the bill.
Seven RCPSYCH members, including a former president and vice -president, have written to MPs to remove themselves from their college concern, instead described the bill as “practical, safe and compassionate” with “clear and transparent legal framework”.
Meanwhile, Claire McDonald, director of my death, said, “No one should be forced to suffer, and the British people want politicians to change the law when a supporting death”.
In the letter to MPs this week, Ms. Leadbator said that supporters and opponents see that “if we are to pass this law, it should be the best and safest bill possible”.
He said: “I am confident that it can happen and it will happen.”
The proposed law will allow terminal-ELL adults to live in England and Wales, to stay with less than six months, to apply for a subsidiary death, subject to approval by two doctors and a social worker, senior legal persons and a panel characteristic.
MPs are entitled to a free vote on the bill and any amendment, which means that they vote according to their discretion rather than party lines.
