In a jail, the terrorist has been found guilty of threatening to shoot a jail officer as he was unhappy with being served a jacket potato for lunch.
Nicholas Brock, who was already serving a jail sentence for information for the possibility of being useful for a terrorist, threatened to shoot the guard from behind the head as the jacket potatoes did not meet their dietary needs, listening to their tests.
In a separate incident, the 57 -year -old abused his probation officer, another “I would just shoot him”.
He was convicted by the Oxford Crown Court for killing the jail staff on 20 May 2024, and on 9 October 2024, the Counter Terrorism Policing South East said.
Brock, who said that the force has a “extreme right -wing ideology”, claimed to know those who can re -activate the gun to use them to harm the jail staff and others after the release.
When the counter-term officials raided their young woman’s house earlier this year, they found an arsenal harassed as a moving rod to passive firearms, a por duster, sword, knife and a sword.
Police said they were sentenced to one year in jail on Tuesday for each count, to run each other continuously, the police said.
Brock was examined in 2020 and found racist videos, paintings and video footage from the Christchurch massacre in New Zealand.
Police said he was also a collector of World War II and Nazi Germany military goods.
In March 2021, Brock was convicted in three cases of occupation of a document, which is likely to be useful for the person who prepared or prepared an Act of terrorism and went to jail for four years – but was due to release in March this year.
Claire Fineley, Chief Superintendent of South East Detective, head of counter terrorism policing, said: “Brock’s behavior has demonstrated that his extreme right -wing mentality was not reduced during the time spent in jail and his aggressive behavior was increasing as his prison had reached close to the release date.
“After investigation by the expert counter-terrarator policing officers of my unit, it was clear that Brock continued to risk significant damage to the victims in the case, as well as the posts of public members and rights from the minority background.
“Brock claimed to know criminal colleagues who could re -activate his firearms and therefore was important that we took fast action to protect our communities from that loss.”