SAnd Kir StamorIt is a plan to review how human rights laws apply asylum seekers There have been strong reactions with many people in the UK Independent The readers accused him of becoming a “improvement-light”.
Critics argued that the Prime Minister, historically a staunch protector of the European Conference on human rights, now demands to weaken security for those who flee to torture or live with their families.
Many warned that even minor changes can set a dangerous example, potentially reduce the rights that everyone in the UK depends.
However, other people were seen Review As a practical reaction to grow MigrationEspecially record the channel crossing, and suggested that it may clarify how the courts explain Article 3 and 8 – a refugee is a “right to family life” in the home country of a refuge seeker to cover “cruel and inhuman treatment” and completely removing security.
A minority of readers supported the Prime Minister’s approach, arguing that it is necessary to balance compassion for those who seek real refuge with the pressure of the migration.
Whereas, some also noted that the aspects of laws are now old and we need more “lean, adaptive and fast walking” approach to deal with modern pressures. Immigration,
What did you say here:
Echr may have to adapt
Circumstances change and ECHR may have to be adapted, but suggesting what corrections and toris want, crying far away from that is to leave it completely for the UK. It is interesting that the stormer is highlighting that many of our irregular migration problems stems from leaving the European Union. If it heralds a media campaign to highlight the downsides of the braxit, and pin the draw on Faraj, it will be a good step. It is about the time when they blamed for this, and the more people know about the damage, the more they can develop an enthusiasm to join again.
Tanaquil2
You can’t create a two-tier human rights system
“It is absolutely necessary to change the law on these four items.”
No, it is not and it is a matter of concern that people believe in it. If the Health Secretary does not understand the International Human Rights Act, then he should consult experts.
There is something called customary law which means that even if we come out of ECHR, some laws will still be applicable – why Rwanda was considered illegal.
You cannot create a two-level human rights system where rights do not apply to foreigners. It is immoral and is a slippery slope.
You have to question why these politicians want to take away their rights to challenge the government – Hillsboro Anyone?
JSM
Stamor International Law cannot change
I am not sure I understand. Starmer cannot change international law – which is not within its remit or right. The echr law arises from the Council of Europe, and all member nations must transfer it to their national laws. They are not binding, but the national law should follow the principles they cover.
Removing Russia and Belarus from COE would be a huge goal. This will repeal most of the UK/European Union and the UK PAN-European agreements.
UK courts cannot be ordered to disregard or ignore international laws, signed by Britain; But the Supreme Court can issue guidance on implementing these. So I am not clear what he is suggesting.
Jonathan Mills
Over -confusion
More confusion. If there is “mass migration”, it is mostly “legal” i.e. some of 1.2 million in ’24 that enter the visa and may or not be more. Clearly did not reach 1.2 million small boats!
Lots of? I will imagine this. But then paying your own people to do anything, only giving lip service for vocational training, teaching beyond normal pockets and all in private hands seem to be relaxed to me. Again, gradual governments have done all these.
ouleejit
Running a coach and horses through the modern slavery act
This is a very misleading statement because he cannot do anything unilaterally. Does it seem that the scheme is running coaches and horses through the modern slavery act, which is from the famous Left-Vinger Theresa. good grief! “Wake up” for May Labor Now.
Best wishes to find a compromise between 40-odd countries from ECHR, as you cannot catch “small boats” and “illegal”.
The European Union has agreed to change the process when it comes to claiming asylum inside the European Union. But you went into a week. And the refuge in the European Union is reduced. And people are large and large for their rights. Only England is only discussed to cross rights.
Lafti &praude
Laws should reflect day circumstances
The laws should reflect the circumstances of the day and move the fleet forward to deal with the issues on the ground. National and international laws have shown themselves sclerotic when facing unprecedented immigration in the West.
We appear helpless for the dangers of Russian and Chinese effects on our infrastructure and institutions. The British judges and politicians as well as the current law appear to be stuck in the past and are unable to protect our country from the crime of all Natures.
We need a lean, adaptive and rapidly growing approach to deal with British crime or will become a million five million collected in London recently.
Aare
More toz
Still more than PM. Legal migration is below for the day government of the day and deliberately decisions were taken to increase the number of immigrants allowed to work here. Both toes and labor are complex in it.
Illegal migration has increased through small boats as all other routes have been closed. And the stearmer, such as before him, has not had the courage to do necessary, which is to send every boat from France to France immediately. People’s smugglers business models will be destroyed within weeks.
Noverngit1
I am sick waiting for labor survival
I am sick waiting for labor for a small bit wing. Labor is Star, Reeves, Cooper and Blair. There is no war that they have not liked or a profit that they have not supported the cutting. Or he has not given sweetness in exchange for funding.
For decades, members have supported PR but they have fully supported the two-sided system and still do it. If you are not a fan of that brand of politics, then forget them.
Ficralpical
The stormer is “improvement light”
Rather, the stormer improves due to “improvement light” compared to “labor heavy”. I think this is because when someone said to him: “This is the economy”. He had to answer: “Yes, but I have not found any clue how to deal with it. So I cobble with token measures, as if Tories did and will improve.”
Rebootedyetagainhans2
This proves that labor cannot solve immigration
This announcement just proves how impossible it is to resolve the immigration issue for a starrer and labor party. This is not a bold new policy; This is a hesitant “review” that will be Hamstranrang by many people at its party.
He is trying to talk strictly, but he is surrounded by trotskiists, stalinists, hardcore federals and leftist ideologies for which open boundaries are a fundamental cult. His own Attorney General is already reported to be strongly opposed to any real change.
His job is like cats. He cannot do what is necessary because his party will never allow it. When he is talking about reviewing the interpretations, the British people cross the channel while looking at the record numbers.
He will never go too far to please the public as he is a prisoner of his own alliance. This “dramatic u-turn” is just a political theater. People’s will demands action, not more reviews should be watered by left -wing fringe which has real power in their party.
Thomas