Rahel reeves Shouting Labor rebel With record investment in his spending plans, because he unveiled the major boost for NHS, social housing and defense.
In reviewing his long -awaited expenses, the Chancellor also promised to save £ 1BN by shutting down everyone Refuge hotel As he targeted Nigel Faraz and Reform,
But experts warned that he would have to break the pledge of his manifesto Raise taxes Or to increase much more borrowings to pay for his promises.
In a harmful assessment, Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said: “Chancellor’s speech was full of speech number, some of them were useful.”
In particular, there was a concern about how to save on those who seek housing shelter Increase in small boat crossing, And there were questions on how the payment for public sector workers would increase.
Chancellor Said that during the review period, the-partial budget running up to 2028-29 for the day-day expenditure and 2029-30 for capital investment will actually increase by 2.3 percent per year.
But Labor has been front-loaded by cash injections made since taking over, which means an average increase from 2025–26 is 1.5 percent more modest.
And the scale of additional expenditure on NHS in England will increase to £ 226bn by 2028-29, 3 percent equal to the annual growth-squeezing other areas.
Chancellor’s speech was happy by labor backbenchers, but there were concerns in other places, as well as as well Labor Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan Expressing disappointment at the disposal of London.
According to the IFS, eight departments faced real-term cuts in their budget, potentially saw a stand-off for the last day with Home Secretary Yatevet Cooper after a rated talks.
Its department is facing some of the largest cuts, with a loss of 2.2 percent of real terms by the end of Parliament. Police chiefs said that an increase of 1.7 percent in the next three years was a “huge blow”, which would leave the forces struggling to fulfill their pledge for the recruitment of 13,000 neighborhood officials.
According to the IFS, cash to expand cash to expand free school food meant that the budget of the schools was “tight”, while the departments of environment, food and rural affairs (Defra) and culture, media and sports (DCMS) were facing “lump sum budget cuts”.

Meanwhile, questions were being raised on how Ms. Reeves will meet the salary demands of public sector employees after explaining to government departments that the growth would need to be funded from their budget settlements. Already, doctors are threatening to go on strike if the government fails to meet its demands for an increase of 29 percent.
Former government economist Jonathan Ports warned the expenses mentioned by Ms. Reeves, which means that tax growth was “very likely”.
He said: “Currently it is actually very likely that the yogas spent today will mean that taxes need to go up in October so that Chancellor can meet fiscal rules (especially the goal of balanced the current budget).”
Mr. Ports suggested that Ms. Reves can target savings, pension and fuel fees. Meanwhile, the review of the expenditure allows the local government to increase tax tax over inflation up to 5 percent annually.
Mr. Johnson suggested that an investment of £ 445 million in Welsh Rail Infrastructure, £ 14.2BN for sizewell C nuclear plant in energy budget and additional funds for defense means that Ms. Reeves will have to rethink her tight rules on borrowings.
He said: “If the government insists on depositing the additional expenses planning on the entire Parliament, then it is only appropriate that we also draw attention to £ 140BN additional borrowings for additional borrowings in the same period. This lending faces a cost as additional loan interest – and is larger than a year ago.”
However, the Chancellor insisted that he would meet all government commitments with no additional tax or loan due to the “difficult decisions” made in his budget last November.
In a 40 -minute speech, which seemed to attempt to respond to critics from within his party, he insisted: “My choice is labor options.”
It along with other cabinet ministers along with other cabinet ministers including Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rener and Ms. Cooper followed the weeks as they demanded to avoid major cuts in their departments.

Refusing her perspective is “Tapasya 2.0”, Ms. Reeves said: “This is a review of spending to give the priorities of British people: security – a strong Britain, in a changing world. Economic development – Economic development – operated by investment and opportunity in every part of Britain.
“And the health of our country – with an NHS fit for the future. I have made my choice. In place of chaos, I choose stability. Instead of fall, I choose investment.
“In place of pessimism, division and defeat, I choose national renewal.”
The Chancellor in his speech took a target twice in Mr. Faraj, saying that he should spend more time to focus on the priorities of the British people and focus on the Westminster Arms Pub at a short time, as the labor improvement continues to face the danger of UK’s rise.
But the opposition politicians were in a hurry to criticize their plans.
Tory shadow Chancellor Sir Mail Strid told MPs that Wednesday’s spending was a “fantasy” and “not worth the paper that has been written”. She warned: “She knows that she will need to come back here with more taxes in autumn, and is waiting for a cruel heat of speculation”.
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Daisy Cooper MP said: “There is a possible black hole for social care behind smoke and mirrors as local government’s budget is at braking point. Putting more money in NHS without fixing social care is like pouring water into a leak bucket.”
Wealth fund managers also warned of tax growing, which is a pioneer for a millionaire flight from the UK.
The head of investment analysis in AJ Bell, Lath Khalf said: “Meditation will now change what can happen in tax”.
And Davre’s CEO Nigel Green said: “Reeves is spending money that he has not received – and the tax will come in this autumn.
“There is just no other way. The UK is already heavy tax, development is flat, the cost of borrowing is high, and global hunger for gilt is thick. Autumn budget is where the ax will fall.”