Rahel reeves After accepting the future tax has avoided increasing Government concessions On its welfare reforms “Harmful,
Government avoided a major common defeat on Tuesday on Tuesday A backbenth rebellion After this, U-turn on plans banned eligibility Personal Freedom Payment (PIP).
But as he faced questions as to how the climb would affect the treasure, Chancellor Must be warned “What happened to cost,
The original welfare proposal was part of a package, in which it was expected that ministers would save up to £ 5 billion in a year, warning that the rebels are now likely to plug the differences left by concessions due to tax growth.
Ms. Reeves said: “It is harmful.
“I am not going to deny this, but I think where we are now, (Minister of Disability) with a review led by Stephen Tims, which is clearly incredibly honored and a large amount of experience, this is the path we are now taking.”
The Prime Minister Sir Kir Stmper has said that the government is still committed to welfare reforms, but the ministers will now wait for the conclusion of TIMMS review before implementing the change in PIP.
Deagal has been threatened with permanent damage to morale in labor rank, calling for a reset for reset in relations between parliamentary party and leadership with some MPs.
On Wednesday, the images of the Chancellor who cried in the Commons also took away the financial markets and raised questions about its future, although a spokesman for the treasury said that tears were the result of a personal case and Downing Street said that she would remain in the post.
In an interview with The GuardiaN Newspaper, Ms. Reeves said that she had never considered resigning, saying: “I did not work hard on her.”
She said that she had gone to PMQ because she “thought it was the right thing” but that “in retrospect, I probably want to go to the office in a difficult day … (at).
