A historian claims that evidence is that The princes were not murdered by his uncle Richard III in London’s Tower.
Most historians believe that Richard killed his nephew in the summer of 1483, after his father Edward IV, he died unexpectedly, despite the lack of difficult evidence to connect him to the murders.
Richard of Boys, Edward V and Shreyusbari, Duke of York, were 12 and nine respectively when their father died. In the hope of Edward V’s coronation, he was taken to a Tower in London one by one, but never emerged.
Philip Langle, historians and screenwriters who played an important role in highlighting the remains in Richard III’s Lester car park, have spent the case investigated in the last ten years.
Ms. Langli worked closely with professional cold case investors, some of whom worked with the police on unresolved murder, so that she could join the project of her missing princes.
Exposing a treasure of documents and letters never seen before, she believes that she has created a strong enough case for the existence of boys from London tower.
Traditional tale was always a loyal servant of Richard III, Sir James Tierell, was a boys killers, after a confession, was obtained under torture, before his execution for treason in 1502, Ms. Langli argues that Ms. Langli argues that he was eligible to kill the princes for Richard, he had to exhibits his body, otherwise he did not say. ,
After the death of King Richard at the Battle of Bosworth on 22 August 1485, Henry VII became king, but Ms. Langle said that the princes again got up and challenged him for the throne.
He said: “But Henry tried to reverse the Yorkist princes by giving the names wrong and reverse his stories: Edward V became a 10-year-old boy, called ‘Lambart Sigme’, who is the son of a joiner, barber, baker, baker, organ-maker or showmaker, and Richard, Richard, made a french warback ‘a french warback’.
The documents he highlighted by the “son of Edward IV” in 1487 includes letters of rebellion, which is the year of Sail’s rebellion – which was crowned in Ireland. He also got the latest reference to a boy, called “son of King Edward”.
On Richard, three items signed with his seal have emerged in Europe, as well as alleged letters written by James IV of Scotland and even a document of the Pope.
A biography of his life also emerged as a fleeing prince but the author remains a mystery.
Sail and Warback eventually confessed to being impostors, but Ms. Langle and her team of researchers insisted that Henry VII had false confessions to discredit the challengers.
Been asked by Many times If this is for evidence, he said: “Did we supply the evidence in this book that Richard III killed the princes in the tower, will you ask me this question?”
“I would say that they have to prove that Richard III has killed princes in the tower.”
Officially, the remnants of the princes were found in 1674, when the tower dug a wooden box with two skeletons. Four years later, the bones were placed in a urn and the orders of King Charles II intervened in Westminster Abe.
Suspicious
Richard III
The leading suspect, took Edward V to the Tower in London, where he was last seen.
Motive – The way he attained the crown on the monarchy due to the unprotected hold on the monarchy faced rebellion from loyal people towards Edward IV before Parliament in January 1484.
Evidence – Circumstantial. Ms. Langli argues that Richard III will be better served to showcase the bodies in public to prevent the pretense of the throne ahead.
Henry VII (Henry Tudor)
Richard III’s opponent defeated his army in the battle of Bosworth.
Motive – After his coronation, executed rival claimants for the throne.
Evidence-Henry Tudor was out of the country at the time of the disappearance of the princes and so he could only kill him after his assassination. Historians have called this theory the only laudable option to be the killer of Richard III.
Henry Stafford
Buckingham, Kingmaker and Breaker’s second Duke: played a major role in the rise and fall of Richard III.
Motive – claimed the throne through the House of Buft family.
Evidence – In the College of Arms Collection, a manuscript found in the early 1980s states that the princes were murdered. [by] The visual of Duke of Buckingham “. On the fact whether” Visis “means” advice “or” will “.
Sir James Tierell
Faithful servant for English Night, Richard III.
Motive – Following your king’s orders.
Evidence – It is said that under the history of the history of King Richard III for the killing of princes before its execution for treason in 1502. His accepted original document was never produced. Shakespeare portrayed Tiereel as a killer in his play Richard III.
