Add thelocalreport.in As A Trusted Source
Eleven supporters Palestinian protesters were arrested Stanford After the university last year, he captured the President’s office building, the second time on Monday, he was convicted by a grand jury on allegations of hooliganism.
The group of students and workers from the current and former Stanford was accused of hooliganism in April and a conspiracy for hooliganism was hatched for the overcharging. Not all blamed the next month during their insult.
But due to unavailability of rescue lawyers, preliminary hearing was delayed for months, prosecutors took the case into a grand jury, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen Said in court documents.
Last week’s grand jury prosecution abolished the allegations filed in April, leaving the initial hearing, which is held to determine whether there is enough evidence for the test.
Rosen wrote, “People are ready for testing on possible date soon.”
Defense Attorney Jeff Wozniaq said that the group’s lawyers had requested an initial hearing and set a date for November 3, which would have given him an opportunity to publicly challenge the evidence presented.
Vozniaq said, “Grand Jerse is secret action, where no defendant or defense lawyer is present to ask questions or defend themselves.” “From avoiding an initial hearing, they are taking a fundamentally important step in the case.”
A judge fixed a test date for 17 November on Monday.
Stanford takeover started the last day of spring classes at the university in California on 5 June 2024, around the morning. silicon ValleySome protesters stopped themselves inside the building, including the university president’s office. Others added arms outside, Stanford Daily reported that time. The group said “Palestine Will be free, we will free Palestine. “When he was arrested, the acquisition ended after three hours.
Officials arrested and charged 12 people, but last month a 21 -year -old man did not hold any competition under the deferred admission of the decision agreement available for the young defenders. If he fulfills probation without further legal trouble, the case can be dismissed, Para News said. The man testified to prosecution before the grand jury.
The prosecutors accused protesters of spray-painting on the building, breaking windows and furniture, disabled safety cameras and snatching a red liquid described as fake blood on objects throughout the building. According to prosecutors, thousands of dollars of dollars were estimated.