Sir Kir Stamor Bresing for The biggest backben rebellion of his leadership After the publication of its major welfare reforms, till date, MPs and campaigners were immediately backlash.
Government plans to cut the plan disability benefits “Horrifie”, “harmful” and “a disaster” have been described as the campaigners warned that it is already struggling with people with disabilities poverty,
Improvement – More people have been determined to tighten the norms for personal freedom payment (PIP), with the aim of encouraging more people in the work and more people in work, which is the main disability benefit, as well as the universal credit (UC) disease -related element delayed and only 22 years and older people were delayed.
Will remove the bill Stool From Up to 800,000 people And the Department of Work and Pension (DWP) assessed itself, was published earlier this year, it was estimated that the reforms would appear additional 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – were pushed into relative poverty.
The ministers are likely to face a common stand-off with backbench labor MPs on their plans, out of them dozens of them said that the proposal was “impossible to support”.
In an attempt to discontinue some protests, the law – known as the Universal Credit and Personal Freedom Payment Bill – will give the existing contenders a period of 13 weeks of financial assistance.
The Department of Work and Pension said that this PIP would apply to the people affected by the changes in the daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility for the consultants and the UC career’s element.
Speaking as a bill, it was published on Wednesday, Labor MP Brian Lishman told Independent: “I will vote against these frightening reforms, and I think the 13-week transition period is an insult to the people with disabilities.
“The government should talk to disability organizations that it should really hear about his life experiences as it is for sick and disabled people.”
His comments were echoed by fellow Labor MP Nadia Whitom, who said that there is “no financial matter or moral case” for cuts.
He said, “It is clear that this bill is not making positive improvement for welfare, but income disabled people need to be cut.
And sir Ad daviLeader of Liberal democratBill said “weaker families will be killed with a double fame … killing people with disabilities who cannot work with these cuts, which will lose their careful loved ones also”, he warned.
, Traditionalist Left a vast welfare bill and we need to bring it down, but the government’s plans risk backfiring by making it difficult for people with disabilities and their care. ,
On Wednesday, Angela Rener refused to punish labor MPs, deputing the Prime Minister’s questions (PMQ), who vote against the government’s plans to cut disability profit.
SNP MP Pete Wish asked if the Prime Minister had intended to remove whip from the rebels, he replied: “We are fully committed to ending child poverty. We have already introduced free school food. We are already supporting families. We have given a living wages to millions of workers who are needed. We are meeting.”
James Watson-O’Neel, who runs the Disability Charity Sense, warned that the cut would “push thousands in poverty, difficulty and separation”. He said, “Many disabled people already find themselves in the loan because the current benefits do not spread far enough. At such a time supporting further support when the cost of survival is high, it is not only unjust – it is cruel,” he said.
And mental health donation Mana said that it is “harmful in extreme”.
“Struggling with your mental health is not an option, but trying to fix public finance by cutting the income of people with disabilities is a political option,” said the policy director Mainesh Patel.
He said, “We urge the MPs to oppose these measures and call the UK government that these deductions will be reconsidered on people with disabilities and their plans to identify the disastrous impact. We can, and do better,” he said.
But work and pension secretary Liz Kendal Improvements aimed at saving around £ 5BN said, “Social security systems are at an intersection”.
He said: “Unless we improve it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it cannot be for those who need it.
“This law represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take a road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.”
But donation Trusell Trust Bill published on Wednesday said that “there is almost nothing to reduce the concerns of hundreds of thousands of disabled people, which are afraid that their social security assistance will burst from them”.
“In fact, this bill will push over half a million more people in severe difficulty and to the doors of food banks,” the policy director Helen Barnard said.
He said: “It is easy to see why so many MPs have worried about the loss of this bill. What has been published today is deeply concerned about the effects of these deductions to MPs on their components.”