Sir Kir Stamor Desire Do not scrap two-child profit hats Leave £ 5BN hole after your U-turn on welfare deduction LaborPlan to spend.
senior Labor data allegedly warned With a change in the controversial hat, the tax hike is on the horizon after the profit climbing, when George Osborne was a Chancellor, was introduced, which is now considered away from the table.
“My evaluation is He is now dead in water“A 10 source told The Sunday Times,
A source close to the Chancellor said: “MPs will need to accept that there is a financial cost to not approve welfare changes, whether it has increased or scrapping a two-child profit cap. They need to understand the trade-off.”
The possibility of placing the two-child benefits cap will provoke fresh disturbance between labor backbenchers, who have a taste for rebellion after forcing Sir Keir’s hand to cut for personal freedom payments (PIPs), main disability benefits.
Sir Kir is believed to have told his cabinet that he wants to scrap a two -child cap – first in 2015 by Osborne.
Critics of policy, who prevent parents from claiming some benefits for more than two of their children, say it pushes children into poverty. Charity often cites a step of £ 3.4bn, which is one of the most cost -effective methods. child poverty,
On Thursday, when asked if he still wants to scrap a two-child cap, Sir Kir said: “The final labor government reduced child poverty and it is one of the most proud things we did.
“Sadly, the final government allowed child poverty to return again.
“I am firm that this government will take it down, as the final labor was done by the government.
“We have got a strategy and a task force working on it and will put out the details. I do not personally think if you do a silver tablet that if you do this one thing, this hair will deal with poverty.” Labor’s child poverty taskforce led by Liz Kendal and Education Secretary Bridget Philipson, Secretary, Kama and Pension, was due to the report in the spring, but was delayed by autumn.
Pressure on PM on two-child benefits cap is likely to increase to this autumn budget, in which Rahel reeves Used to be Warned,
Jim O’Neel, a former head of Goldman Sachs, replaced the Treasury Minister, who left the conservatives and later advised Ms. Reeves, saying that she has no choice but to leave the major parts of her economic policy – including her commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance contribution to employees or VATs.
“Without changing some big taxes, welfare and pension, they [Labour] Northern powerhouse rail, small modular nuclear reactors and things like various other things cannot be committed to make an investment and development difference, ”he said that he said that Independent,
