Perfect: Greg Gutfield only said what I was thinking all week!

People think about Greg Gutfeld only as a comic relief, and he is funny – but he is more than just a man who can add a wise here and there.

This 4 -minute bachelor I am going to show you that I am what I am thinking and feeling long throughout the week, and Greg is much better than I could do as much as I could.

this is perfection.

I will just reach the clip in a moment, but I want to churn in myself first …

I am very sick and tired of those who try to the right and left in these situations.

Even my pastor (who is otherwise a rockstar) did it in the church on Sunday, dancing on eggs to try and claim that violence is on both sides because “it is sure” Charlie Kirk violently murdered the neck, but it was that Minnesota Democrat Congress person. “

I am sorry that people, they are not the same!

Also, note how the entire cities are not burning and when someone is killed in Maga, but “Phantenal Floid” dies and we have still not heard the end of it!

So please stop with false equivalent how violence is on both sides… It is not even close!

As I said, Greg said that I can do this.

I am saving it and sending it to all those who continue this foolish argument:

Transcript:

Yes, we do not need it. Ok. What is interesting here, why is this happening only on the left and not right? That’s all we should know.

Yes, then what about Ben stagger? There is no cognitive disder- did we just talk about Melissa Hortman? Oh, oh, do you want to talk about Mail-Melisa Hortman? Did you know before her name? None of us did it.

None of us was spending every day talking about Mrs. Hortman. Till he never heard about him after he died. So, it doesn’t matter? And don’t play that nonsense with me. You know what I am talking about – what I am saying, there was no demarcation, amplification about the woman before dying. It was a specific crime against him who knew him.

Which is the same. And now, you can bring Josh Shapiro, but then you will not bring, for example, that a Palestine was a person. So, “What about this?” The fact, the fact of the fact that the argument of both sides not only fly, we do not care. We do not care about the argument of both your sides. That dirt is dead.

For one thing, there is no cognitive inconsistency on our side. From you, your beliefs do not match reality, so you are coming with these tips, such as “what,” about it, “or,” What about it? ” We are not doing this, because we saw that it happens. We saw that a young, bright man was killed and we know who did this.

We are not coming with the tips. We are calm, we are honest, and we are firm. We are not defensive. And I understand the defensive. I think why people are saying, “What about this?” And, “What about this?” Because if you have to face the inherent facts for this, then your life is going to separate, because you realize that you are not good people.

If you are sitting around and you have defended the mutation of children, then you are not good people. If you have 600, 700 cases of harassment against Republican, Uh, and you said, “But what about this?” And then you see this killer after calling someone fascist – “You fascist” – you realize, “Maybe I’m not a good man.” There is a hell of feeling to deal with it.

Therefore, therefore, you have to understand rationality. You do not need to do this, Jessica. They do. I do not believe that you are part of that group, but why do you have to copy and echo the nonsense? He was a patsi. The man was a patsi. He was subject to a con-to-conjumer nihus, and you know that a cone was subject to artificial sleep.

If you can decide that biology is wrong, then you may agree that – this murder is fine and the expense of humanity. How can you not see that alone, and see what is evil without attaching all these things, for this, beyond me.

I, I just want to be clear, I want to let people speak. I was intended to minimize what happened to Charlie, in any way, Charlie. I was afraid of this. I have not been at five since then.

No, but how I am requesting – but the argument of both sides, okay, likes it – it is like a pig latin for a duck. No, what I was saying is everything, before you say, “They did so.” Because it is a broad brush to paint with it. And this child feels that there is a conversation.

No, it’s not. Charlie had a conversation and was shot. I, I am looking, look, I understand, I get it. Sorry to me, Jessica. I forgive me. You were not here for a week. You came here and it’s cold, and I regret it.

But this is a story that is immune for news cycles, it is immune for rationalism, it is immune for prejudice. This thing is with us. And we all have to deal with him. So, this means that we cannot live by arguments that you are reading about, relativism among the media.

We cannot deal with those stories. It doesn’t matter. Media dead on this story. He created this matter. We are working with it. We are going to work.

We do not care what is now. that’s crap. Sorry for the swearing -in. I apologize to the American public. I am going to remain silent for the rest of the show. __missing.

Web Desk: Web Desk is a dedicated team of authors and editors working for the website thelocalreport.in. This team is responsible for the daily editing and writing of articles, ensuring a steady flow of content that engages readers and keeps them informed. Their efforts contribute to the website's mission of delivering timely news and insightful commentary on various topics.
Recent Posts