New Delhi, 24 September (IANS) On a nation, Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), one election (ONOE), headed by BJP MP PP PP Chaudhary, heard detailed performances of economists Arvind Panagariya and Surjit Bhalla on Thursday, both firmly argued for elections for Lok Sabha and state assemblies.
In the major meeting, 16th Finance Commission Chairman Panagari said that India saw 13 rounds of elections in the five -year cycle, with an average held every 4.5 months.
He recalled that during the 1957 elections, the Constitution Frammers had allowed the disintegration before the time of some assemblies to hold elections together with the Lok Sabha.
He argued that if Frammers had estimated the continuous cycle of today’s elections, they would priority to a system similar to one envisaged in the 129th Constitutional Amendment Bill.
Frequent enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), he said, disrupts policy making, procurement and reform implementation, while constant also delays constitutional bodies such as Election Finance Commission.
He said, “On the contrary, a once-five-year election model provides a long and clear policy horizon for both the state and the central governments, reduces uncertainty and creates stability that encourages private capital formation,” he said.
He also pointed to large educational evidence that indicates an increase in government spending before the election, causing high fiscal deficit; This is because the government expands fiscal expenses to promote short -term growth.
Elections simultaneously, they stressed, policy will provide stability, reduce subsidy burden, and remove obstacles and often make it to the union-level reforms during the voting season.
Surjit Bhalla, the chief economist and former executive director in the IMF, resonated to him, saying that the problem is not being held every five years in the Lok Sabha elections. This is, he said, “Repeated state elections which are a matter of concern.”
He claims that the MCC accusation matters more for the state elections and is not that much for the Union due to its structured and fixed frequency for the Lok Sabha elections.
He said, “… non-simples elections are expensive and there is a luxury that we can no longer tolerate,” he said, and further said, “… The low frequency of elections under Ono will reduce violence.”
Bhalla said that elections increase violence and also increase the cost of opportunity on financial activists.
Both experts said that ono will strengthen democracy by reducing volatility and promoting reforms.
,
SAS/UK