There is a wave of misinformation recently spreading online about Tucker Carlson and Marjori Taylor Green.
Earlier it was a smear about his ideas of Iran/Israel War, which did not accurately reflect what he publicly said or what he really believes.
With that war now and no longer in the news cycle, the smears are now moved to Zorohan Mamdani, and once again they do not accurately reflect what tucker and MTG have publicly said or what they really believe.
And I really hate to see it coming from people like my good friend Sean Farash, whom I really like and respect and agree to most of the time – but I am sorry that Shaun, Shaun, it’s not factually correct what you said here:
Tucker and MTG praise Jajrahan Mamdani…
These two are getting inadequate …
pic.twitter.com/piwowivz3g– Sean Parash (@Shawn_Farash) June 28, 2025
The same Iyal goes for Yakobi, whoever you are:
The fact is that Tucker Carlson is openly praising Zoharan Mamdani.
– Eyal yokoby (@eyakoby) June 29, 2025
I am not sure if I intend to weaken the tucker and MTG, and I am definitely not here to tell you here that both of them are 100% accurate.
They will not even tell you this.
Tucker has said many times earlier that he was very wrong in the past and changed his mind to many things.
I think what a wise brain does, it comes to new conclusions when presented with new information.
You should not change your morality or values or do not change the beliefs closely, but if new evidence suggests that you are clearly on the wrong side of a policy issue, you should adapt and change.
But let’s come back to this subject because I do not know what is happening here, but it is just factually wrong and it is untrue to say that Tucker and MTG are “openly praised” Karan Mamdani.
I saw the entire interview, and they both very clearly say many times that they definitely do not like her and do not support any of her policies. He said that extremely clearly, and you should really know that simply easily. It is not difficult to find out.
But the points that they were making are the same precise point which is built on the all-in podcast this week, the reason is that the Mamdani is echoing with the people and shooting the chart, because she is working very clearly and very well-saying that she will represent the first New York. This is his job.
Besties is back!
Vishal Week:
-12 -day war ends in the US -led ceasefire
– How the markets digested it + Future of this region
– Why socialism won in NYC, what does it mean for democratic installation
-Shaiyas hit the height of all time to complete the wild turnaround
– Science corner:… pic.twitter.com/tceqhn5bxm
– All-in podcast (@TTallipod) June 28, 2025
How he does that we all disagree completely, but the political analysis point to be done here is that there is a sea-change in politics and the candidates who have explored a very simple point of putting people representing the first people, are a winning message.
This tucker and MTG were saying.
All this arose in the context of the question of a debate, the mayor’s candidates were asked which foreign country they would visit if they were elected as NYC Mayor.
The answers were from the approximate Ukraine to Israel.
But Mamdani stole the show saying that he would stay in New York City as it is work.
game changer.
On debate.
These people want to listen.
Will he eventually be good for the city? Not hell! This will be a disaster and will cause great damage to NYC and will leave many states.
But here the point is a broad political analysis why he is echoing with people.
This was the same for President Trump … first remember America?
Mamdani, at one level, is just driving a playbook that Trump was chosen twice (three times?).
Heck, even Berney Sanders fits in this category.
Berni and Mamdani have been made socialist recruitment that will destroy this country, but their messaging is a populist America-first / New York City-First Message and is a win of a victory.
It is quite clearly amazing how many people and politicians do not understand it or have not yet learned.
So stop with all the nonsense that the tucker is “praising” Mamdani.
He did nothing.
And if you all take it away from him, or if you only see an edited soundbite, you may not be intellectually furnished adequately for this type of interaction.
Will be better.
Full interview here if you want to hear it clearly and in context:
