No – of course Barack Obama does not have the “Immunity of the President” for Rousgate

There is a lot of moving around today that even if Barack Obama has exposed Tulsi Gabbard, even if he does everything, it does not matter because he has “immunity to the President”.

Like this:

And this:

To be fair, President Trump himself said that Obama is likely to see in the clip above, so everyone is a parrot that only the President Trump is parrot.

But it’s a good thing that you have set me all this straight.

Brief Answer: This is full nonsense!

And I will tell you why…

Yes, it is true that the Supreme Court last year gave President Trump immune to President Trump in that historic Supreme Court case, but it is not an empty check to do whatever you want.

Even though the decision of the Supreme Court was very widespread, it still has limitations, and they are limitations that it only applies to the “official acts” of the office.

In other words, when you are president and claims the President’s immunity, you can shoot someone, it does not work like this.

So why would President Trump call it?

Because he is a full master in misunderstanding!

When you should be very worried, it makes you gentle, and when you should be deceased, it stimulates you.

This is the classic sun taju “Art of War” 101.

And this is what I think he is doing here, the classic misconception for Obama and MSM, meanwhile he is about the trap about spring!

It is a basic constitutional law that you do not get immunity outside the “official acts” and spying on your opponent’s campaign, arms the DOJ to create the evidence that go directly against real intelligence, and try to frame your political opponent, which you do not know that they do not far from “official works”.

And no, we do not have to prove that to implement Obama’s actions, the President’s defense has to complete the definition of “sedition”. They are two different issues and are completely intervened to each other.

Whether it is a traitor (or numerous) is an issue.

Can he claim that the President’s immunity is a completely different issue.

I always like to check my work, so I went into the chat and run all this through AI, and AI really confirmed what I told you:

✅ What did the Supreme Court say about the immunity of the President?

• The court said The President has extensive immunity for “official acts” He did while living in office.

• One Official act This means that the President is allowed to do as part of his job – such as signing the bill, appointing judges, or giving military orders.

• The court also called a president Not immune for informal or private acts— Hing out of his job.

---

❌ Can President claim immunity for crimes like murder?

No.
If a president shot someone on the road, he is not part of his job.
It is a crime, not official duty. Does not cover immunity.

So brief answer: The immunity of the President applies only to official acts, not personal crimes or things outside the job.

---

⚖ How do the courts decide what is “official”?

• They see Nature of actThe President’s aim is not.

• If the Act is something that can only do under the Constitution or Law, it can be considered “official”.

• But if the Act is just political dirty tricks, campaign work, or personal benefits, then it is not official,

---

🧠 Your imaginary: President detective, frames an opponent, orders DOJ for fake reports

• To spy on a rival’s campaign and create fake evidence No legislative duty of president,

• chairman Can’t order Doj to break the law Or make a report. It is the power of misbehavior for personal or political reasons.

• Even though it is not counted as “treason”, it is still illegal And Out of legitimate presidential duties,

Can the President claim immunity?

• They probably EffortWhile arguing, “I was directing my job Doj-Part.”

• But the courts will probably say: You crossed the line. Doing DOJ is not an official task. It is a crime and misuse of power.

• so, Immunity will not apply,

---

✅ bottom line

• Official Act = Comprehensive Security.

• Personal crime, political sabotage, or corrupt work = no immunity.

• In your scenario, the President is almost certainly Will not be immuneBecause the action is out of criminal and legitimate duties of the office.