Matadata shows that FBI’s Jeffrey Epstein Gel Video was edited with Adobe Premier Pro – two source video was placed together WLT Report

Matadata shows that FBI's Jeffrey Epstein Gel Video was edited with Adobe Premier Pro - two source video was placed together WLT Report

It keeps getting bad and worse for only Palm Bondi and DOJ …

We have previously discussed all the methods in which the Jeffrey Epstein Gel Videos that it released was beyond the measurement, but now more news comes that the video was almost certainly modified and edited – with – Adobe Premier Pro:

Not only this, but reports are also emerging that editing involves at least two different sources video together:

New: ‘Raw’ Jeffrey Epstein Gel Video Matadetta was probably revised, “according to a new report by Wired.

The outlet says he analyzed the 10-hour gel video with “independent video forensic experts”, which modified the “raw” footage.

The outlet emphasized that at the moment, there is no evidence that the footage was somehow “misleading manipulated”, but says it was somewhat modified.

“Instead of direct export from the prison monitoring system, the footage was modified, possibly using the professional editing tool Adobe Premier Pro,” Wired found.

“The file appears to be assembled from at least two source clips, saved several times, exported, and then uploaded on the DOJ website, where it was presented as ‘Raw’ footage.”

“Experts warned that it was not clear what had really changed, and that metadata does not prove misleading manipulation.”

The development comes as Deputy Director of FBI Dan Bongino, it took day after a confrontation with AG Palm Bondi to allegedly deal with the footage of the prison.

The editing of the video should not be completely surprising as DOJ told us from the beginning that they were increasing the video to make it easier to watch.

ALSO READ  Epstein deception: Did Trump flip the world's most dangerous blackmailer? , WLT Report

Per HillHe also released a original version and a great version:

But after the release of the video about the Timstamp, more doubts came out, which jumps ahead in a minute at midnight on 10 August. Jump is worth noting In original video And A great version From FBI.

So that part is not amazing.

The amazing part is sewing two separate video sources simultaneously. It does not feel right and it does not feel good.

The news of editing was broken for the first time Wired:

Here is a quick summary of the major points made in that article:

  • DOJ released about 11 hours of monitoring footage Before his death from outside the cell of Jeffrey Epstein, it was labeled as “full raw” footage.

  • Matadata suggests that the footage was editedAdobe Premier Pro is likely to use, suggesting that it was assembled from several clips and saved several times.

  • Experts say there is no evidence of deceptionBut editing indicates that the video was not completely untouched, possibly improved for public release.

  • A ‘minute interval The footage exists (from 11:58:58 am to 12:00:00); Doj gives it to one Regular system reset It happens at night.

  • Technical issues noted Include changes in aspect ratio and compression artifacts, leading experts suspect that the footage will be acceptable as raw evidence in the court.

  • However, the timeline appears beyond the difference, Video labeling has been criticized as “Raw” Misleading Raise public skepticism,

  • Maintain DOJ and FBI The footage supports the official conclusion: Epstein died of suicide And no unauthorized person could reach his cell tier.

  • Critics argue that editing should have been revealedTransparency is more doubted as fuel deficiency.

  • Attorney General Palm BondiAppointed under Trump Administration, defending the release of Doj and said that The difference was purely technical More videos Supports established story,

ALSO READ  A simple hack to detox from the covid vaccine. WLT Report

Join WhatsApp

Join Now