Kim Clement In 2006: Hillary Clinton Will Be The Whistleblower That Takes It All Down | WLT Report

I’ve watched a LOT of Kim Clement clips over the years, so many that I pretty much think I’ve seen them all.

That is, until I saw this one from 2006.

I have never seen this before, and it’s rather stunning.

I wish I could find the full video of where this was taken from but as best I can find it’s not out there.

Now I find this quite hard to believe, but I’ve also realized it’s not very wise to bet against Kim Clement, so I’m just throwing this out there for everyone to take in.

Here is Kim Clement in January of 2006 saying Hillary Clinton will eventually have a turning and a testimony “second to none”.

Killary Gone Good?

Hey, I guess if it can happen for Saul/Paul, then I guess God can use anyone.

This truly would be stunning…

Watch here:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

And some of you said when the Spirit said, “Hillary Clinton,” some of you shouted out, “Yes.”

God said, “I’ve already dealt with her heart, not to be president of this nation, but to be president in a Christian world.”

She will have a testimony second to none, and will eventually come out with it and make declaration that Christ Jesus saved her marriage, saved her child, and saved her life.

And when this happens, there will be a shaking in the Democratic Party so powerful.

Backup here if needed:

Kim Clement In 2006: Hillary Clinton Will Be The Whistleblower That Takes It All Down pic.twitter.com/8rE3mEAbd0

— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) July 24, 2025

Still, seems a bit hard to believe as things look right now.

Right now, she seems to be nothing more than a washed up lady prone to fits of anger and taking daily horse tranquilizers:

Hillary Clinton — Suddenly It All Makes Sense

For over a decade, we’ve told you Hillary Clinton is batshit crazy.

Not just because I don’t like her or disagree with her politics, surely all of that is true too.

But her behavior was objectively off the charts “Coo coo for Cocoa Puffs”.

It was plainly obvious for anyone with eyes to see, just like I believe one day I will be writing an article just like this one after it is revealed in the future that someone in a mask was playing Joe Biden, at least at certain times and in certain places (Exhibit A: the Ballsack Chin).

Now back to Hillary…

Tulsi Gabbard just told us the myriad of medical issues and drugs Hillary has been under, and it seems like it should be enough to kill a horse.

How she even survived these last 10 years is beyond me.

Watch here:

Tulsi Gabbard drops bombshell: DNC emails revealed Hillary’s emotional instability & daily use of heavy tranquilizers. 👀 pic.twitter.com/XMz4kfh6VK

— Victoria Byrne (@Thevictoria76) July 24, 2025

Much more here:

Did We FINALLY Just Learn What Happened That Day They Loaded “Weekend At Bernies” Hillary Into That Black Van?

Did we finally just learn what happened that fateful day when Hillary went full-on “Weekend At Bernies” and they had to load her into that black van?

I think so.

Remember this?

Revisiting Hillary Clinton and The Infamous Black Van

I think Tulsi Gabbard just gave us the answer in the newly declassified new batch of documents released today.

These might be the most stunning we’ve seen yet, and it looks like Hillary was suffering EXTREME mental and physical diseases.

Like…I’m not quite sure how she was even alive, extreme.

See here:

BOMBSHELL: New Declass Reveals Hillary Clinton Had “Intensified psycho-emotional problems…uncontrolled fits of anger” — Was On Daily Regimen of Heavy Tranquilizers

Newly declassified documents reveal that Hillary Clinton was suffering from “intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.”

Where I come from, we call that CRAZY, but what do I know?

They also show Hillary Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of “heavy tranquilizers” and while afraid of losing, she remained “obsessed with a desire for revenge.”

In addition to all of that, they claim she had Type 2 diabetes, congestive heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

I guess now we know exactly what caused this:

Clinton was suffering from “intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.” Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of “heavy tranquilizers.” pic.twitter.com/NFj61FNDW9

— Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) July 23, 2025

Watch as Tulsi Gabbard lays it all out here:

DNI Gabbard: 👀

“There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary Clinton’s psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness. And that then-Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers.”… https://t.co/3ai507DmRm pic.twitter.com/nRxLIZWf84

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 23, 2025

Here is a closer look at some of the key documents that were declassified today by Tulsi Gabbard:

And because those are a bit hard to read, I have a full transcript for you right here:

Page 19 of 46

As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton’s health to be “extraordinarily alarming” and felt it could have “serious negative impact” on her election prospects. Her health information was being kept in “strictest secrecy” and even close advisors were not being fully informed.

• The SVR possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from “intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.” Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of “heavy tranquilizers” and while afraid of losing, she remained “obsessed with a desire for revenge.”

• The SVR also had information that Clinton suffered from “Type 2 diabetes, congestive heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.”

• The SVR possessed a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to “distract the [American public] from the Clinton email server scandal.”

The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) in August had details of secret meetings with multiple named US religious organizations, in which US State Department representatives offered — in exchange for representing Secretary Clinton — “significant increases in financing” from Department funds and “the patronage” of State in dealing with “post-Soviet” countries.

FBI Director James Comey testified to the Committee that, by August 2016, the SVR and DNC emails which the DNC was telling people that Informer Attorney General Loretta Lynch was keeping a special channel of communication open with the Clinton campaign informed on what the FBI was doing in the Clinton email investigation.

The SVR also had information that the DNC leadership had prepared a report for President Obama about a Clinton Presidency. They had “expressed notes of doubt regarding her ability to perform the functions of head-of-state” and her election would “create Clinton’s potential vulnerability to ethical issues, which would highlight the potential value of leaking the details of the percentage offerings given to the Clinton Foundation for access and services in exchange for support of the Clinton campaign.” The ICA redacted assessments also use this as a reason why it would be hard to assess the value of such releases, reliability of motivation, and similar considerations. This information was confirmed to President Putin or his Presidential Administration staff. The ICA did not quote this report.

---

Page 20 of 46

The SVR reported in January 2016 that it had information taken from a US think tank indicating that a high-ranking official in the Democratic National Committee (DNC) knew about the application of political pressure on the FBI in the Clinton email investigation by a high-ranking official of the US Department of Justice.

In March 2016, the SVR had intercepted discussions between a high-ranking DNC official and a US non-governmental organization indicating that a Clinton staffer was receiving updates on the FBI’s Clinton email investigation from a high-ranking Department of Justice official.

---

What the ICA Says: Speculation on Tactical Priorities

SVR officers were protective of the accesses they used to derive intelligence reports for Putin… and may have argued to prevent the disclosure of non-public material… that, if disclosed, would have endangered continued collection on US decision-making.

---

The ICA speculation about SVR tactical priorities doesn’t make sense, given that the media had already reported on Russian intrusions into DNC servers by June.

Many of their accesses were already blown by the GRU leaks and subsequent media reports and from postings by private US companies.

---

The cyber security company CrowdStrike had enough information to make this attribution and was able to apply countermeasures and improve security measures.

---

The ICA pointed out that politically sensitive decisions to leak or not were made by President Putin personally. So it still would have been his call — regardless of ICA speculation on what the SVR might have argued — to hold back material during the critical final three weeks of the election. Putin’s strategic priorities would have trumped any SVR tactical concerns about accesses.

Does this finally explain what we witnessed here? 👇

Revisiting Hillary Clinton and The Infamous Black Van

There are some things that have happened over the last 8 years that remain mysteries.

BIG mysteries.

The envelopes passed out at the George Bush, Sr. funeral are one such mystery.

That’s a biggie.

But also near the top of the list of mysteries is what happened with Hillary Clinton the day she was escorted into that Black Van.

Remember that?

It was unclear if she was having a medical emergency or what happened, but when she “emerged” on the street later that day, she looked nothing like Hillary Clinton.

As usual, I’m not here to advocate clones or bots or any of that nonsense.

But I do know when something doesn’t look right.

And mask technology is NOT conspiracy theory….

Here’s the former CIA “Chief of Disguise” telling you how good they are — the President himself couldn’t tell the difference:

Former CIA Chief of Disguise — “I Briefed Bush Sr. In A Mask And He Couldn’t Tell!”

So while I don’t know exactly what is going on, I know when something isn’t right.

And let me tell you, something is VERY “not right” about what happened that day.

Which is why I really enjoyed the deep dive @TINFQIL did on Twitter, going deep down this rabbit hole and asking a lot of questions.

That’s what journalism used to be…..digging and asking questions.

And maybe you don’t have all the answers when you start, but you investigate.  You dig.  You ask questions.  You keep pushing until you start to connect some dots.

So that’s why I think what he’s done here is excellent.

Here’s his first Tweet, and then below that I’ll give you the full unrolled thread:

https://twitter.com/tinfqil/status/1733020522030440477?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg