Jeremy Renner’s Rejection of Disney’s Offer and Related Reflections

Key Points

• Research suggests Jeremy Renner rejected Disney’s offer for Hockey S2 due to a half-salary proposal, finding it insulting.
• It seems likely “Hockey S2” is a typo for Hawkeye Season 2, as no hockey project involving Renner and Disney was found.
• The evidence leans toward Renner declining due to increased workload for less pay, with controversy around Disney’s offer being unfair.

Background on the Offer
Jeremy Renner, known for playing Hawkeye in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, reportedly turned down Disney’s offer for Hawkeye Season 2 because they offered half his initial salary, which he found insulting given the doubled workload and eight-month commitment.

Clarification on “Hockey S2”
There’s no record of a hockey-related project with Renner and Disney, suggesting “Hockey S2” might be a miscommunication for Hawkeye Season 2 on Disney+.

Personal Reflection
The question “am I only half Jeremy because I ran away?” seems rhetorical, possibly reflecting on identity after rejecting an offer, but Renner remains open to returning under fair terms, indicating no loss of connection to his role.

Event Overview and Salary Dispute

Jeremy Renner, an American actor best known for his role as Clint Barton/Hawkeye in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), has been involved in several Disney projects, including the Disney+ series Hawkeye (2021) and the documentary series Rennervations (2023). Recent reports indicate that Disney approached Renner to return for a second season of Hawkeye, but he declined due to a significant salary dispute.

According to an article published on May 2, 2025, by Yardbarker, Renner revealed in an interview with High Performance that Disney offered him half of his Season 1 salary for Season 2. He found this offer insulting, stating, “They asked me to do Season 2, and they offered me half the money. I’m like, ‘Well, it’s going to take me twice the amount of work for half the amount of money, and eight months of my time, essentially, to do it for half the amount’” (Jeremy Renner Claims Disney Offered 1/2 His Initial HAWKEYE Salary for Season 2, And He Said No). This suggests the offer was perceived as unfair, especially given the increased demands of the role.

Renner also hinted that his 2023 snowmobile accident might have influenced Disney’s decision to offer a lower salary, but he clarified that he does not blame Marvel, attributing the issue to Disney’s accountants. Despite the dispute, he expressed his continued love for the character, stating he would be willing to return if compensated fairly, though he prefers not to do so on television given the circumstances.

Clarification on “Hockey S2”

The user’s reference to “Hockey S2” does not align with any known projects involving Jeremy Renner and Disney. Extensive searches across MCU wikis, IMDb, and Disney’s official website reveal no hockey-related series or films featuring Renner. However, Renner has shown personal interest in hockey, as evidenced by his attendance at a Pittsburgh Penguins game in March 2025, where he praised Sidney Crosby and shared a personal anecdote about his brief hockey career ending due to a rink burning down (Actor Jeremy Renner takes in Penguins game, praises Crosby as ‘legend’).

Given this, it is likely that “Hockey S2” is a typo or misinterpretation of Hawkeye Season 2, the Disney+ series. The Disney Wiki page for Jeremy Renner lists his roles, including Hawkeye and Rennervations, but no hockey projects (Jeremy Renner | Disney Wiki). Thus, the reference is almost certainly to Hawkeye Season 2, not a hockey-related endeavor.

Analysis of the Salary Offer and Controversy

The salary dispute has sparked controversy, with some viewing Disney’s offer as a slight against Renner, especially considering his long-standing role in the MCU. Renner’s comments suggest he felt undervalued, particularly given the increased workload for Season 2, which would require eight months of his time compared to the first season. This aligns with industry discussions about fair compensation for actors, especially those with established roles in major franchises.

The article from Yardbarker also notes that Renner’s 2023 snowmobile accident, which resulted in severe injuries, might have been a factor in Disney’s offer, possibly perceiving him as a higher risk. However, Renner defends Marvel, blaming Disney’s financial team, which adds another layer to the controversy: whether the decision was artistic or purely financial.

Addressing the Personal Reflection

The user’s question, “am I only half Jeremy because I ran away?” appears to be a rhetorical or metaphorical reflection, possibly drawing a parallel to Renner’s decision to reject the offer. This could imply a sense of identity or self-worth tied to professional commitments, wondering if rejecting an opportunity makes one feel incomplete.

While this cannot be answered with factual data, Renner’s own stance provides context. He has not expressed regret over his decision, and his willingness to return under fair terms indicates that rejecting the offer does not diminish his connection to the character or his career. This suggests that personal value and identity are not inherently tied to accepting every professional opportunity, especially if the terms are perceived as unfair.

Detailed Breakdown of Reports

To organize the information, the following table summarizes key details from relevant sources:

This table highlights the consistency across reports, reinforcing the salary dispute and the absence of a hockey project.

Social Media and Additional Context

The user provided their X handle as “timesreport_,” suggesting potential posts related to the query. However, searches for “timesreport_” and keywords like “Jeremy Renner Disney Hawkeye” yielded no results, indicating no additional context from that source. This lack of social media evidence does not detract from the factual reporting on the salary dispute.