Information due to which Afghan data leak superinjunction is being raised Available last year, the government has admitted – questioning why the unprecedented gagging order was maintained for so long.
Major leakage in February 2022 reveals the personal information of 18,700 Afghan While searching for the sanctuary in the UK, inspiring an unprecedented court order, it was revealed to ban any details of the leaks that it would fall into the hands of the Taliban and put 100,000 people at risk.
After a review by the Defense Secretary, it was removed on Tuesday John Hele, which concluded in June, It was found that the threat of danger was not significant to those people in the list.
Now, it has come to light that defense intelligence officials, who advised the government about the need for superintendent, had access to this information last year.
In a written response High court The judge’s demand is for further investigation on why the order cannot be raised, a senior government official admitted that a large amount of review given by the Defense Secretary was based on it. Already known for the Ministry of Defense.
Defense Officer Dominic Wilson stated that significant review of data breech’s response is “a large extent on information available in the first stage and by Defense Intelligence”.
The case to maintain superintendent, which had been for almost two years, was based on the assessment of defense intelligence officials on a large scale, who argued that thousands of people would be in danger of death if it was reported that data loss was reported.
However, the government’s review led by the former Deputy Chief of Defense Intelligence, Paul Rimmer concluded that, while additional murders occur, with other targeting of former Afghan authorities, “It does not appear to be the basis for targeting only on dataset”.
“Should the Taliban target individuals, the wealth of data inherited from the east [Afghan] The government will already enable them to do so, ”it continued.
After receiving a copy of Shri Rimmar review, the judge heard the case, Mr. Justice Chamberlain, “expressed an concern that the initial assessment by the modes about the risk, on which the superinjunction finally rested, may have reached without full consideration by the modes of relevant information”, Mr. Wilson explained.
The judge was worried that the government “could reach very soon, very quickly, the presence of the prescribed risks in the Rimmer review and due to which it was decided to discharge the prohibition”, the statement said.
Raising the order on Tuesday, Mr. Justice Chamberlane said the conclusions of the review “fundamentally weaken the clear basis”, on which the prohibition, and the decisions to keep it, rely on it.
In response to the latest revelation, a Downing Street spokesperson said the superinjunction soon “needs to look at properly, which is why we will welcome the defense SC review” questions were raised questions.
On Wednesday, Sir ker stormer Expressed his anger over the cover-up and said that Tory ministers “have serious questions to answer”.
Meanwhile, the Commons Defense Committee has launched an investigation in Breech, which went so frightening.
And for science innovation and technology, Commons Committee Chairman Dame Chi Onvurah has said that she will write the information commissioner to push for an inquiry.
She is calling for reconsideration on why she has refused to conduct her investigation so far, despite issuing a fine of £ 305,000 for very small modes of data breech.