This is almost untrue, but the judge of the District Court, appointed by another Obama, has once again stepped into to stop and stop the Trump administration.
Despite the large, beautiful bills, the full Congress is going through the process and despite the legally signing of the law and legislation in the law, and despite the Supreme Court, recently ruled on 6-3 that the nationwide prohibitions issued by the District Court judges are not lawful, we are here. once again.
To keep an eye:
Obama appointed Boston District Judge Indira Talwani, prevent parent mortal to prevent medicid funding to block the provisions of a large, beautiful bill act
what happens now?
TRO will lead the initial prohibition on July 21, 2025,… pic.twitter.com/eznhpfxdhf
– MJTRTHULTRA (@MJTRUTHULTRA) July 7, 2025
The lofter appears to never end.
Lawfare: First, the Democrat judges blocked Trump’s EO-operated agenda, now they are preventing Congress from passing the law. If neither the President nor the Congress can rule without the permission of undisclosed evil judges like Indira Talwani, who stopped the beautiful law … pic.twitter.com/wupej3qrvd
– @Amuse (@Amuse) July 7, 2025
If you are wondering how this can be possible, then there is a quick summary that breaks issues:
Judge block provision: On July 7, 2025, US District Judge Indira Talwani issued a part of a new federal law 14-day temporary preventive order (TRO), which would cut the Medicade funding for employed paternity.
Bill observation: On July 4, 2025, there is a major tax and spending package with improvements of a large, beautiful bill act, medicid, snap and more signed by President Trump, adding more than $ 3 trillion to national debt.
Targeted provision: The bill involves a section to prevent medicade reimbursement for providers, which mainly offer breeding services, if they also do abortion – then certainly seen for the purpose of planned paternity.
Existing law reference: Hyde modifications are already being used for most abortion to federal funds. The planned paternity uses a medicade fund for cancer screening and other services such as STI testing.
Employed paternity lawsuit: Planned paternity and his colleagues filed a lawsuit, arguing that the bill is wrongly targeted and violated constitutional rights. He warned that it could force 200 clinics to close.
Judge’s argument: Talwani temporarily stopped enforcement, cited potential irreparable disadvantages and concerns that the provision punishes the employed paternity to provide legal services.
Next step: An initial prohibition hearing for July 21, 2025 is scheduled. Based on the result, the case can proceed through the high courts.
Public reaction: Supporters praised the decision as protecting healthcare access. Critics, including some orthodox commentators, labeled the judge’s move as an overache.
Background of Supreme Court: June 1, 2025 The Supreme Court’s decision allowed the states to allow the parent -mortgage employed to the Medicid, complicated the federal case, but did not determine its results.
Hill Makes the first call of its kind to the ruling:
The ruling of US District Judge Indira Talwani is the first known example of the federal judge, which limited the enforcement of any part of the “Bade, Beautiful” bill, signed by President Trump on Friday.
It was sued a provision a few hours after the employed paternity, which imposes a one-year ban on state medicade payments for health care non-profit institutions that also offers abortion and receive more than $ 800,000 in federal funding in 2023.
Talwani’s decision still allows the administration to implement the provision against other providers, but employed paternity says that it involves almost the entirety of the affected institutions.
The judge issued the decision before the government responded, no explanation beyond a brief note that the employed paternity showed him “good reason” to intervene immediately.
The ruling lasts for two weeks, and the judge will rule on whether a long prohibition should be given after the July 21 hearing. Talwani is the appointment of former President Obama.
Emphasizing that the federal law already prohibits federal financing for abortion, the planned paternity argues that this provision unconstitutionally singing the organization, violates its equal security rights and violated the amount for retaliation for preserved speech of planned paternity.
The group warned that if the judges do not attend immediately, it would have to cut.
The group said in a statement after its decision, “We are grateful that the court worked fast to attack this unconstitutional law planned paternity providers and patients.”
Part in bold is going to cheer up …
Yes dummy, that’s it!
This is what Congress voted!
This is why President Trump has signed the law!
A punished district court judge should not end the wishes of the Congress and the President!
And for that case, we have the desire of those who chose them!
They have to be cut at all and/or going out of business. This is the full goal!
