Sir Kir Stamor Despite this, I vow to proceed with your controversial welfare reforms Tightening more than 100 of your own MPs to reject plans,
Disregard Prime Minister kills back Labor The rebels warned that “who care about the future welfare system” should support the law.
MPs are ready to vote on reforms next Tuesday, which are Treasury is expected to save £ 5BN in a year in savingsBy reducing personal freedom payment (PIPS) for most disabled people.
12 ministers are understood to consider rebelling against the law, while 108 labor MPs have signed a new amendment that will stop the bill in its track.
But talking to reporters in the aircraft NATO The summit in the Hague, Sir Kir said: “We were elected to change what we have broken in our country. The welfare system is broken, and that is why we will move forward with our reforms. It is very important that we do this, because the current system is not working for anyone.
“People are stuck in it, and I am not ready to allow this to happen. So we will move forward with our reforms”.
The Prime Minister also denied that he had failed to convince his MPs in the moral case for reforms.
“There is a clear moral case that the current system does not help those who want to come to work. It implicates people. I think these 1,000 people are walking on pip a day.
“Each year PIP additions are equal to the population of a city, which is the size of a lester. It is not a system that cannot be left uncontrolled, not leased because it is unstable, and therefore you will not have a welfare system for those who need it in the future.”
Taking a swipe in more than 100 labor rebels, he said: “Those who care about the future welfare system will have to answer this question – ‘How do you improve that you have received to ensure that it is durable for the future?
“But it is not durable to connect the size of the lecester every year and assume that there may be a permanent future for the future, a model.”
Cabinet Minister Pat McFaden said that the government listens to Labor MPs, but there was no possibility of changes in suggestions.
