hundreds of Ministry of Defense (MOD) data violation In view of your ability to protect sensitive information, questions have been revealed as questions Afghan data violation,
The latest mod data suggests that there were 569 incidents in 2023-24-up-last years, up-ranked electronic equipment in which the protected documents were not being properly dealt with.
In an incident last year, 272,000 employees details – including names and bank details – when one of its systems run by an external contractor was hacked by “malicious actor”.
In another case, the mod was fined £ 350,000 for violations related to emails related to the Afghan transfer and assistance policy (ARAP) by the Information Commissioner – a plan to bring Afghans with a link to the British forces for security in the UK.
Powerful Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) Chairman Lord Bimish has demanded the mod demanding why high security information is being organized on low-protection systems.
It follows the revelation of a horrific this week Data Breech, Which exposes 100,000 Afghans from potential rebels Taliban, Inspiring three years of cover-up through the cost of UK taxpayers and the use of an unprecedented superinjunction.
Further concerns came to light on Thursday, it was revealed that British spy and special forces soldiers were also potentially exposed by the incident.
Last year, Sir Grant Shaps made a statement to the Commons in which it was revealed how the hackers had access to the share of the armed forces.
The under consideration contracting system captured the names, bank details and the addresses of soldiers, reserve personnel and recently retired veterans in some cases.
Already, members of ISC, who have a statutory duty to take into account government agencies, are angry that MOD ignored a request by a judge to share the details of the original Afghan data violation with the committee.
But now the Labor Peer, who presided over the committee, has questioned whether the modes of the modes to handle sensitive data are quite good.
Lord Bimish said: “It seems that there have been many violations. It is not only about the system but how they are used. The big unanswered question on the Afghanistan data leak is that such secret information was being held on a lower-side system and not a safe encrypted system.”
ISC has demanded documents related to Afghan violations and can start its investigation into the scam. But the issue is also to be raised in the investigation that the Commons Defense Select Committee will organize after summer holiday.
Labor Defense Selection Committee Chairman Tan Desi said: “It is going to be one of the most expensive email blunders in history. There are huge impacts on many different levels for transparency within our democracy.
“Stricter security measures should be to ensure that this cannot happen again. It is shameful that courageous Afghans serving with British soldiers have endangered their safety with this leak.
“While our defense committee has agreed to make inquiries in this shocking situation, we have yet to set full scope for that, in which who will be called to give evidence.
“This violation of revelation has also put our brave British service personnel at risk, makes the situation even more shocking. I am sure the committee would like to understand how this can be allowed to happen.”
Another Labor MP of the committee, Calvin Bailey, who was a Wing Commander responsible for organizing extraction flights from Kabul, when the Taliban participated in power in 2021, he said he did not believe in the system of the mod.
Asked if he felt that the mod was protecting the data properly, he said: “No, not me. Why was this data collected on an official unpredictable system?”
Labor for Lon and Vanstad MP, who has explained how the chaos around Afghanistan inspired him to leave a magnificent military career to enter politics, warned that Undeencoring and Understanding in the mod also contributed to Afghan data violations.
Former Defense Secretary of Tory Sir Grant Shaps, who was being engaged in superinjunction and the construction and expansion of a secret route to bring Afghans to the UK has broken its silence to protect its works.
Sir Grant told the BBC: “You can argue that the circle should actually be widespread, but in the end, the number one priority was to ensure that we protected life and people were not killed.
“It is a very great decision to make, and the more you open it, the more likely you are.”
He claimed that “the public understands that there are times where you just have to work in the most maximum way”.
MOD has been approached for comment.
