The ruling argues us that Google should sell some advertising equipment
Google says this will appeal
Google searches for a decision before facing another monopoly test.
Google did not monopoly
April 17 – Alphabet’s Google illegally dominated two markets for online advertising technology, a judge ruled on Thursday, gave another blow to the tech veteran and paved the way to American antitrust prosecutors to look for a breakup of his advertising products.
The US District Judge Leone Bink, at Alexandria, Virginia, found Google to the publisher advertising server “to maintain and maintain the willpower” to maintain and maintain the willpower “and found in the market for advertising exchanges, which sit between buyers and sellers. Publisher advertising servers are platforms used by websites to store and manage their advertising inventory.
Antitrest Enforcers failed to prove a different claim that the advertiser of the company had a monopoly in the advertising network, he wrote.
Regulatory Affairs Vice President Lee-Ani Mulholland said that Google would appeal to the ruling.
He said, “We won half of the case and we would appeal to the other half,” he said that the company disagrees with the decision on its publisher equipment. “Publishers have many options and they choose Google because our advertising technical equipment are simple, inexpensive and effective.”
Google shares were about 2.1% below afternoon.
The decision clears the way for another hearing to determine what Google should do to restore competition in markets, such as some parts of their business should be sold in another test that has not yet been determined.
Doj has said that Google should sell at least the Google advertising manager, including the company’s publisher advertising server and Ad Exchange.
Google is now facing the possibility of two American courts that order it to sell property or change its business practices. A judge in Washington will conduct a test at Doj’s request next week to sell his chrome browser to Google and take other measures to end his dominance in online search.
Google has previously discovered the sale of its advertising exchange to please European antitrust regulators, in September, Reuters reported.
Brinkema tested three weeks last year on the claims brought by Doj and the alliance of the states.
Prosecutors stated in the test that Google used the classic monopoly-making strategy to eliminate contestants through acquisitions, to stop customers to use their products and control the transaction in online advertising market.
Google argued the case focused on the past, when the company was still working to enable its equipment to join the products. Google’s lawyer said the prosecutors ignored competition from technology companies including Amazon.com and Comcast as digital advertising expenses shifted to apps and streaming videos.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without amending the text.