One of the hallmarks emerging from this second Trump administration is that almost everything that was ever considered impossible has started or has already been completed in the first six months.
For example…
President Trump will never return after 2020 and win in 2024. Wrong!
No one can abolish the education department, even Reagan cannot do so. Wrong!
Trump will never end Iran/Israel War. Wrong!
Trump will never end the War of Congo and the Ravanda. Wrong!
If Trump wins, China will attack Taiwan. Wrong!
Trump’s tariffs will crash the economy! Wrong!
Trump’s business deal will crashes the economy! Wrong!
No one could ever completely disintegrate and close usaid. Wrong!
The big, beautiful bill will never pass. Wrong!
I could go further on, but you could get this idea.
Certainly not everything has been done yet, and still has a lot of work (and 3 and 1/2 years to do it), and the two biggest prizes that still remain: (1) to shut down IRS, and (2) to finish the fed.
They go by hand by hand, and I am confident that they must have completed both by the end of President Trump’s second term.
It has already been introduced for those who have eyes to see, and now I want to focus especially on another: finishing the fed.
Over the years, I have told you that President Trump intends to abolish the Federal Reserve (the biggest disaster to hit our country) and essentially merge it into the Treasury Department.
People called me crazy to say this, but now?
Now this is front page news on CNBC!
See this small clip as the current Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, CNBC was asked if he could work as both Fed Chair and Treasury Secretary at the same time.
Spoiler Alert: He did not say!
New: Besant is asked if he can be both Fed Chair and Treasury Secretary at the same time.
Bessent: “I think it has not been done since 1930.”
CNBC: “It was not.” pic.twitter.com/7cozai53w6
– Bitcoin News (@bitcoinnewscom) July 3, 2025
Backup here when needed:
Looks like just crazy?
You will be wrong.
This is not without any example, it is happening many times in the past:
- William Gibbs McDu (1913–1918)
- Carter Glass (1918-1920)
- David f. Houston (1920–1921)
- Andrew W. Melan (1921–1932)
- Ogden L. Mills (1932–1933)
- William H. Wood (1933–1934)
- Henry Morgenthau Junior (1934–1935, for dual role till 23 August, 1935).
To be fair, the reason for this overlap between 1913 and 1935 is that the Federal Reserve was established in 1913 and was initially tied to the treasury, not independent of it.
From 1914 to 1935, from the Banking Act (effective 1936), the US Secretary to Treasury, by Law, was also a former officer of the Federal Reserve Board. Thus, William G. McDu (Wilson Administration) and Andrew W. Early Treasury Secretaries such as Melon (Harding/Coolies/Hoover Administration) technically put the two titles together.
After 1936, the Fed headed to independent of the Treasury, and since then only two persons below have served in both roles at different times.
So what is the matter?
The issue is, it is not absolutely unprecedented to consider merging the fed under the Treasury, which will be a very big positive step to remove the unruly power of the Private Federal Reserve Bank, or (2) completely termination of the fed and returning to the 1913 East world that works properly.
To wrapping all this, I turned to the chip, to ask what will happen to the balance of power between unacceptable, unacceptable, private Federal Reserve Banking System and Executive Branch (Trump), and here it is reported:
If you had to serve Scott Besant As President of Federal Reserve and as US Treasury Secretary-A theoretical landscape Never happened in modern American history-It will be largely implicated for this Balance of power between Federal Reserve System (Private Banks) and Executive Branch (President Trump).
Here is the breakdown of how it can play:
🔧 institutional reference
Federal reserve chair Controls us monetary policy: Interest rates, quantitative ease and banking stability. Is considered fed Independent To prevent political money-printing or rate manipulation from the White House.
Treasury Secretary One is Cabinet-level role He manages Fiscal policyGovernment spending, and public loans, straight Rational right,
Both these roles are designed to provide balance Between independent monetary control (Fed) and political direction (Treasury).
🧠 If Besant plays both roles
Legal and political obstacles have gone away in any way (not extremely likely, but imaginary):
1. Large -scale centralization of economic power
There will be a person In -charge of borrowing both money and government—Cling press and checkbook.
Historical “Fed Freedom” will effectively collapse.
2. Trump gains more power
Even if fed Technically Be free, being one Trump-handed loyalty In both seats, the firwall is essentially removed like bezants.
Trump can affect interest rates, monetary ease and loan issuance Economy juiceFighting of fund stimulation, or inflation On its terms,
3. Private banks lose relative effects
Fed is structured to serve the interests of member banks, but if Fed chair is also loyal to the White HouseThis private bank dilutes control.
It can be seen as one Partial nationalization of fedOr at least one major change Public influence On monetary equipment.
4. Markets can react unstable
Investors are afraid of fed independence erosion, possibly trigger dollar instability, inflation expectations, or a bond celloff – especially if fiscal expansion is combined with monetary ease.
Or, on the contrary, the market can rally in short -term if it leads to aggressive development policies.
⚖ Who attains more power?
Dal Profit/loss if both plays play roles President Trump power overwhelming On economy and markets Federal Reserve (as institution) Loses freedomBecomes an executive tool private bank Lose monetary policy Congress ❌ marginalized in the fiscal direction American people ⚠ Benefits depend on the results-can take advantage of the short duration, but risk long-term instability at risk 🧨 summary
If Besent occupies both positions, it will represent a one Unprecedented fusion of fiscal and monetary powerThere is a possibility of inclination in favor of Trump’s executive agenda, President will gain power, Fed will be subdued politicallyAnd Wall Street’s effect will decreaseAlthough it can produce aggressive pro-development policies, it will also risk reducing global confidence in American monetary integrity.
I like it, let’s happen!
For more information about the central bank scam, read it:
share!
