A DJ Facing allegations that he lied during a claim of £ 100,000 compensation. London Cafe.
In June 2018, a fallen brick -bunny chloe calet was injured using his phone outside the Kipaferal Cafe in North Kensington.
She then claimed that she could not do DJ for six months.
However, Ms. Callet is now facing allegations of “fundamental dishonesty”, which came out after evidence of the fact that it was actually “traveled around the world during that time”.
He allegedly gave many performances in clubs, launch parties and programs … Paprazi and Media Gossip columns, “are included,” Burn Festivals in Nevada Desert.
The 33 -year -old told a judge this week that she “misunderstood the question” when she filled the legal documents, claimed that she could not work.
The lawyers for the DJ told the Mayors and City County Court that it could have been very seriously hurt as the falling brickwork was only missed by her head as she went ahead and was looking at her mobile phone when she was killed. His neck, shoulders and legs were injured.
She is suit for the building owner, O’He Holdings Limited, for approximately £ 100,000, claiming that the incident stopped her career when she was unloading.
As part of her case, she said that she was “not able to work” for a six -month -old accident “and” could not perform any performance “, but after social media evidence she was forced to refuse” dishonesty “after she appeared in events on” many continents “.
The lawyer for the building owner is now asking the County Court judge, recorder King, that he is central for his alleged “dishonesty” case about the impact of the accident to take out his claim and hand over the legal bill for the case.
However, Ms. Callet rejected the allegations and stated that “misunderstanding” to answer questions in pre-testing documents, “not accurate”, she believed that she was being asked about the ability to perform in the same way as DJs, in the same way he worked in a pre-accident, did not work normally.
Ms. Callet is a DJ, manufacturer and multi-instinouslist who has played in some of the most famous clubs in the world, as well as to sound the catwalk show and released her own music.
Although Born in Paris, she has enjoyed a jet-set life, which is based several times in New York, Bristol and Ibisa, and when she had an accident, she was living in Cannesal Rise, Northwest London.
According to court documents, she was injured when “without warning, a section of a brick cornice fell in front of the building and landed on the claimant”.
Ms. Callet says that she suffered soft-oak injuries to her left shoulder and knee, back injuries, injuries, and her legs, legs and hands as well as a host of psychiatric effects.
She claims to suffer from dizziness, sleep disturbances and nightmares, anxiety and memory loss, and pre-tested documents stated that she was unable to work for six months.
Opening the case, Barrister Philip Gundundi said that Ms. Callet was “lucky” because she was looking at the fact that she was looking at her phone, which means that she avoided a hit from a square on her head.
“She says it was a clearly frightening event and was lucky that it should not be worse as a result,” he said.
O’Ahre’s lawyers accepted the liability for the accident, but accused him of “fundamental dishonesty” after an investigation by his social media, showing him in incidents around the world during six months.
Among others, she appeared at the Burning Man Festival, a famous music and art program in the Nevada Desert in August to September that year, magazine launch in New York and Pop Up Street events in September, a program for Barbari in October and the inauguration of Andy Warhol exhibition in November.
For the owner of the building, Barrister Nick Grimshow stated that the evidence clearly revealed that Ms. Callet was “dishonest” when she stated in the claim documents that she was “not able to work for six months after the accident”.
“The defendant admits that the claimant maintained a soft tissue injuries in the accident,” he told the judge.
“However, the defendant’s case is that the claim of earning loss is fundamentally dishonest.
“The claimant returned to work as a DJ immediately after the accident and performed internationally at several high-profile locations during six months, for which there is a loss of earnings.
“Evidence of these demonstrations comes from intelligence evidence, which included posts mainly on the public Instagram account of the claimant, which were carried out before the proceedings started and later removed.
“On 23 March 2022, the defendant revealed social media evidence, showing that the claimant traveled worldwide in the period from July 2018 to January 2019, gave several demonstrations in clubs, launch parties and programs.
“He also maintained a high-profile in the calendar of Fashion, Celebrity Events and Music Festival documented by Paprazi and Media Gossip columns.”
He said: “The defendant said that the proof of the claimant’s inability to work or to perform for six months is fundamentally dishonest at the inability to perform for six months.
“She was able to work from an early stage and did so during the period from July 2018 to January 2019. By mid -September 2018, she was extremely busy.
“The claimant’s own Instagram account tirelessly self-promotes, and travels for many performances in many continents-but these entries were then removed.”
Giving evidence, Ms. Callet told the judge that the reply she gave was wrong, she accepted, but insisted that it was due to her “misunderstanding” which she was being asked.
He said that it stems from the use of the word “performance”, which he took as part of the “front-facing” DJ set rather than a preacher at a fashion event.
“At the time when I read the question, I misunderstood what happened in the context of ‘performance’,” he said.
He said, “This type of work I was doing was passive types of work,” he said, sometimes “pre-obtained playlists or sets” were included or to be photographed just for promotional purposes.
He said that the incidents that do not include any of the incidents involved, especially to buy a ticket to watch her game, said that she returned to the actual performance with one night in Paris in January 2019, she said.
His presence in the Burning Man was unpaid, court documents were revealed, and came after his escape because he had a pre-bred tickets.
His barrister, Mr. Gundundi said that Ms. Callet “did not lie” and suffered losses as she was not able to work in the six months that she had already happened.
“It should be clear to the court that, on any approach, the contenders were not able to work because he would have absent the accident, was returning to the other and completely working in a minor or casual manner for several months, or after six months, after six months,” he said.
She said that she accepts her answers in the document “factually untrue”, but it was not “intentionally or dishonest”.
She also insists that, although she earned money in those six months, she must have earned more for the accident.
Ms. Callet is claiming £ 99,851 in loss, the court heard, about £ 62,000 lost in six months after the accident.
The test is going on.