Hundreds of donations and campaigners have urged MPs to continue protests Despite the late night climb from Downing Street, cut in the welfare of Sir Kir Star, Arguing concessions is “a frustrated attempt to escape through a destructive piece of law”.
It comes after being introduced by the government A series of labor rebel concessions The Prime Minister’s first prominent Commons since coming to power in an attempt to stop the defeat.
There were some 126 labor backbenners Signed an amendment When he faces his first Commons obstruction on 1 July, it will stop the Universal Credit and Personal Freedom Payment Bill in his track.
The rebels believe that the agreement on the proposal, including all the existing contenders to protect personal freedom payment (PIP), would be sufficient to win over the majority.
But charity and campaign groups have slapped the proposal, the cuts will enter poverty and create a two-level profit system. Disability Charity Mencap warned that change would create a generational division in quality of life for people with disabilities. Executive Director Jackie O’Sullyventh said, “Cutting disability profit is not a proper way to remove black hole in public purse.”
Amnesty International warned that new reforms “fail on the investigation of human rights”, dubbing the concessions “nothing more than a superficial effort to vote for MPs through this cruel and harmful piece of law.”
The organization said, “This will deepen poverty, increase discrimination, and create a two-level welfare system that cannot be justified under any circumstances”.
“Freezing or cutting benefits for new contenders do not prevent poverty, it pushes more people into generations, increasing income inequality.
“These proposals are not in conformity with human rights. They are being run with those who stand without proper investigation, transparency or engagement with those who stand to lose the most.
“We urge MPs to be firm against a bill, which is discriminatory, loss and marginalized.”
Disability Benefits Consortium (DBC), scope, MS Society and Parkinson’s UK, a coalition of more than 100 disability donations, echoed Amnesty’s comments – stating that the cuts are “believed ‘for the deduction bill”. The concessions “are a dominant attempt to flee through the destructive piece of the law”.
He warned that the government is “cheating the next generation disabled people” “by furthering the deduction on future contenders”.
“In 2025, a person requiring support for washing should be entitled to Pip, but there is no person who has the same need in 2035?
“If the bill passes in its revised form, it will still push more people into poverty and spoil the health of the people. We urge MPs to use their power to prevent this adjacent disaster. The bill must be stopped in its tracks.”
Meanwhile, Tussel’s policy director Helen Barnard stated that the proposal “still present a foggy future for future contenders”.
While the concessions were welcomed, he warned that they still take risks “to eliminate the government’s commitments to eliminate the requirement of emergency food and deal with poverty in serious threat.
“To be disabled is not an option. Our fears are similar, and major MP concerns are still yet to be addressed.”
He said, “We urge the MPs who stood against the bill to do so, and protect those who will influence these changes in the near future”, he said.
And Joseph Ronantry Foundation said the new disabled contenders “these cuts would be pushed into deep difficulty, which should be opposed”.
While he said that the government “heard, understood the severity of influence, and took some reduced tasks”, the organization warned that the bill should “provide correct support to those who are needed without subjugating people with disabled people and without any difficulty”.
He said, “It is not for those who may need support in future”.
Meanwhile, Mental Health Charity Mind said the bill is “roughly flawed”. “If the current security is perfect for people with disabilities, why are they not right for future people in future?” Executive Director Jemima Olchosci said.
Corrections also attracted criticism of Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, which called him “the worst in all the world”.
Talking to reporters on Essex’s visit, he said: “I think we are seeing a government that is a government that is no longer under control despite a vast majority.
“I don’t see how they promise that they are going to be able to distribute anything, if they can do nothing as basic as they reduce the increase in spending.”
Mrs. Badenoch said: “Now what they are doing with this U-turn, is creating a two-level system … It is the worst in all the world.”
The original package of the government had banned eligibility for PIP, the main disability payments in England, and cut the health related element of universal credit, saying it would save around £ 5BN per year by 2030.
Now, PIP eligibility changes will be implemented in November 2026 and will only be applicable to new contenders, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will realize their income.
Work and Pension Secretary Liz Kendal confirmed the U-turn in a letter to MPs late on Thursday night, as well as a plan to review PIP evaluation under the leadership of people with disabilities and “co-made” with people with disabilities.
While the revised bill is now expected to pass through the Commons on Tuesday, it is understood that many Labor MPs are still planning to vote against it, assuming that the adjustment is not enough to reduce their concerns.
One of the major rebellious voices, Dame Meg Hillier described concessions as “a good deal”, including “massive changes” to protect weak people and disabled people were involved in the design of future reforms.
He said: “It is encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a practical agreement that will protect people with disabilities and support people back into work, while the welfare system can be improving meaningfully.”
The spokesperson of the No. 10 said: “We have listened to the MPs who support the principle of reform, but are concerned about the pace of change for those already supported by the system.
“This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it, providing dignity for those unable to work by placing it on a permanent leg, supporting those who can currently reduce and reduce anxiety for those in the system.”
The Department of Work and Pension has been contacted for comment.