New Delhi, 3 October (IANS) Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition demanding the transfer of rent from Tis Hazari Court, calling a cost of Rs 50,000 on petitioners on petitioners as “an estimate of infertile imagination”.
A single -judge bench of Justice Saurabh Banerjee was hearing a petition, seeking to recover a case, a case for recovery of fare, recovery of fare from Tis Hajri, a case for recovery of mesne profits, and prosecution in any other competent court within the same district.
The petitioners accused the trial judge of prejudice, claiming that they had allegedly addressed one of the persons standing in the court in a friendly manner, “joined the respondents.
However, Justice Banerjee of the Delhi High Court found the allegations baseless, given that “the current petition is based only on craze and fans”.
The High Court of Delhi said, “The current petition is nothing, but there is an estimate of the infertile imagination of the petitioners with bald claims without any basis.”
In his order, Justice Banerjee said that the petitioners had actively participated in the proceedings before the trial court, including appearing in the person on several dates and also filed their written statements, truths and entry statements and affidavits.
The Delhi High Court also mentioned that a equal transfer petition was first filed before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, but was later withdrawn, yet “the petitioners have not filed the same with the current petition”.
“Surprisingly, despite the therato, the petitioners have neither chosen in detail about them nor have been selected to file any aforesaid before this court,” said this.
“Through the current petition by the petitioners, the petitioners have tried to cast inappropriate, fictitious and collaboratory contingencies by creating a furious, misleading and mythological claims on a sitting judge … Unlike the records before this court, but without any support,” Justice Banerjee saw.
Finding no qualifications in the petition, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and ordered the petitioners to deposit Rs 50,000 with the Social Security and Welfare Fund, Social Security and Welfare Fund, Delhi High Court Bar Association.
The order stated, “This court, in any incident, has a serious objection to filing the current petition, and that too by creating and cooking a fictional story,” has been stated in the order.
,
PDS/PGH