New Delhi, 3 October (IANS) Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition demanding the transfer of rent from Tis Hazari Court, implementing the petitioners’ costing the cost of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners, calling the petition “an estimate of Hazri imagination”.
A single -judge bench of Justice Saurabh Banerjee was hearing a petition, seeking to recover a case, a case for recovery of fare, recovery of fare from Tis Hajri, a case for recovery of mesne profits, and prosecution in any other competent court within the same district.
The petitioners accused the trial judge of prejudice, claiming that they allegedly addressed one of the persons standing in the court in a friendly manner “, who was associated with the respondents.
However, Justice Banerjee found the allegations baseless, given that “the current petition is based only on craze and fans”.
He said, “The current petition is nothing, but there is an estimate of the infertile imagination of the petitioners with bald claims without any basis,” he said.
In his order, Justice Banerjee said that the petitioners had actively participated in the proceedings before the trial court, including appearing in the person on several dates and also filed their written statements, truths and entry statements and affidavits.
The bench also mentioned that a uniform transfer petition was first filed before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, but was later withdrawn, yet “the petitioners have not done the same with the current petition”.
“Surprisingly, despite the therato, the petitioners have neither chosen anything, nor to do anything in detail nor to file any aforesaher before this court,” said this.
“Through the current petition by the petitioners, the petitioners have tried to cast inappropriate, fictitious and collaboratory contingencies by creating a furious, misleading and mythological claims on a sitting judge … Unlike the records before this court, but without any support,” Justice Banerjee saw.
Finding no qualification in the petition, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and ordered the petitioners to deposit Rs 50,000 with the social security and welfare fund of the Delhi High Court Bar Association counsel.
The order stated, “This court, in any incident, has a serious objection to filing the current petition, and that too by creating and cooking a fictional story,” has been stated in the order.
,
PDS/PGH/VD